14-15-a3319-r;U
1!4 THE C3U3T 0? APPEALS
FOf? THE F7HifJ?£E?-lTH CHJOXClftL OISTf?ICf
HOUSTON, TEXAS
syEN eh?s« zjciha^ssofj, appsllfwt sno se,
us.
^u FILEDIN
bu«a x.s.d., et. al, i4th99.Y£r.OFAPPEALS
%,::.
^~...- appellees
JUL £*#Z-i5
CHhio ior-M£R A. r'HiflE
CLERK
Hn Apasal ffss? tho first DudiciQl District Cfe*
3-33p,er County, Tojtaa
APPcLLAWT PRO BE'a RESPONSE TO
J?IQTIC£- «¥ -TPC SirSL-RS, 'CH3J&T8PHES A* PSIiSES.,,..3f
A P,70 S£ BESP0fiS£ 3Y THIS MOM- OOU.Tf Til
AH ALL EG SO jSKOEPB BSI?;Fn (?)
S¥'S?3 SQIK 35Hfl^3S1?J, APPELLANT PRO SS
T0S3S 1^6^23g/C.T.TarffeIl/^3 unit
1303 F.M. fifiS
Roshsron, Ts. 775-B3
AP-PELLAfiT ?*D SS!s RESPONSE Ti3 £.
•NOTICE B¥ THE OLER«9 CHRISTOPHER A, PilXL'E, OF *// i>
A P??B S?; R^SPO^SE 3¥ THIS HO»I. CQUP.T TO £«/*•
" ~ ~ `` ~ ir^ '"'so
*&W*^i*toMMWilU#**i^M»^MijW^ • wm*m**m*t ifolWtw.*w<#™
TO THS HOM. 3U0GS5 OF S8ID G3i5T?T OF APPEALS? ^SfBt"r ^-e^
COHE's mu, Sy"^l ERIK 30MAWSSf5M, APPELLANT PflO f»E HEREIff, C&M>>^SXgb
this hiss i'-saponae to the titled cause, as foiloys;
#1 . Appslicmfc pra-ss ha© not nsselvoii any copy of f'£I7BERT! of th©
viarass? docu$?njn?.9 or litlgotionCS) stated irs the Hon, Glerlsa »CA!?<)
MSUCE" about AH ALLEGED flH3ER«J 9P.ISF SEltJG FILED, ?50H, AN ALLS^EO PRR SE
SS5P0i}S£ TO OWE 3¥ THIS HO?l. COURT OF APPEALS. . . .(?>
#2. Appellant pro-sa HAS ?*Q COSJSEL. . - {PRO S£>,... -50» i t ia highly •
unlikely *^«* Appellant pra-se- has filotJ any Anders Brisf m HI3 OWTJ
APPEAL-....(?)
#3. HOUEl'Sfl, tllf thn Apaallass havs Filed such a brief, uo do thank
. ... tbtss fe* t*ie5,3? p^fff-osaional GtH&sis nf i-?0.fi£5TVs .snd. aaU t5»».t:- *hi* •#«*,. • .
Court of Appeals BRDSR A SCySSSAL 19 THE DEFAULT 3UDEMEMT ORDER OF THE
HO6!, m&t"; Wimn, 1st 3udleial Olat. Ct, aasspar Co.,Tk., cans no. ^Ba%3
end, OfiBER 5AI9 TITLE AMO 0E£D OF THE MA^O U0fl£STEA3 REPLACED BASvC 1910
THi" LSOAL 5WIERSMIP 8? APPELLANT PRO S5 HSRSIH, and, • should th& Appellees
deaiffa to continua this suit, folloy cSue arocsss etf lea and iasa© aervico
of notice of Intent to sue and Isvy far thsir mensy/texas , glwinc, tC"M3
Appellant pre as a foijc nopiartisnity to ratain a loan on said property
and pay ths back tames uhils Appailani pro-se is incaffceretari, as file
banferupcy...,(?) The letar is MOT Appellant pr»~cj-a*s choice, but, if
forced to .cfo ss, y?.LL d-o so in osdsr to ossye hlo HorssBtead. . (?)
Alternatively, alley Appellant tiaa to rsgain his liharty and 90-cJayo
thsreafttar., thoos tssea will be paid.....{?)
P30TE TO THE CLERK: Pleass las caa^o spooifis sa to y-BOJI filori on ABDGfiS
TSRISf..?. .IM UHQ'g S2HflLP..?..As Apossiliant pro-ss IS A PHO SS APPCLLAWT.
^JG 5U3H 2RI&F UA5 FSLSO [3lV APPELLANT PRO S£. . . , Ai^O A?JPS:LLA?JT PRO SE
?«ftS M8T BSE?I fJ3?IFIE!5 &F A?>5¥ 3UGM CGUISSELO !?APPGl^T«£riTvf. .
