in the Interest of M. M. and B. L., Children ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-15-00234-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN THE INTEREST OF                                        §    APPEAL FROM THE
    M. M. AND B. L.,                                          §    COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2
    CHILDREN                                                  §    ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This accelerated appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    42.3(b). Appellant perfected her appeal on September 9, 2015, and her brief was originally due
    on October 12, 2015. On Appellant’s motion, the time for filing the brief was extended to
    November 2, 2015. When Appellant failed to file her brief by the due date, this Court notified
    Appellant on November 3, 2015, that the brief was past due. The notice warned that if the brief
    was not received by November 13, 2015, the appeal would be presented for dismissal. TEX. R.
    APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
    To date, Appellant has neither complied with nor otherwise responded to this Court’s
    November 3, 2015 notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).
    Opinion delivered November 18, 2015.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    NOVEMBER 18, 2015
    NO. 12-15-00234-CV
    IN THE INTEREST OF M. M. AND B. L., CHILDREN
    Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
    of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV-03-157-14-05)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
    being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of
    prosecution.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision
    be certified to the court below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-15-00234-CV

Filed Date: 11/18/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016