in Re: Armando Madrid ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                   COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    '
    '              No. 08-16-00292-CR
    IN RE: ARMANDO MADRID,
    '        AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    Relator.
    '                IN MANDAMUS
    '
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Relator, Armando Madrid, a Texas inmate, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus
    against the Honorable Martin Muncy, Judge of the 109th District Court of Andrews County,
    Texas, alleging that Respondent has not ruled on a motion to recuse purportedly filed on
    August 5, 2016.
    To obtain mandamus relief, Relator must demonstrate that he does not have an adequate
    remedy at law and that the act he seeks to compel is ministerial. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth
    Judicial District Court of Appeals, 
    236 S.W.3d 207
    , 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). To be entitled
    to a writ of mandamus compelling a trial court to consider and rule on a properly filed motion,
    Relator must establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to rule on the motion; (2) was
    asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed or refused to rule on the motion within a reasonable
    time. In re Molina, 
    94 S.W.3d 885
    , 886 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding); see In
    re Layton, 
    257 S.W.3d 794
    , 795 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 2008, orig. proceeding). Relator has not
    presented sufficient evidence to establish he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the
    petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
    December 7, 2016
    ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
    Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
    (Do Not Publish)
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-16-00292-CR

Filed Date: 12/7/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/9/2016