Frankie Bertolo Mercado v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued December 8, 2016
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-16-00705-CR
    NO. 01-16-00706-CR
    ———————————
    FRANKIE BARTOLO MERCADO, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 262nd District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Case Nos. 1431364 & 1431388
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Frankie Bartolo Mercado, pleaded guilty to two counts of the first-
    degree felony offense of aggravated robbery—deadly weapon, in the underlying trial
    court cause numbers 1431364 and 1431388.1 Pursuant to plea bargains in both cases,
    1
    See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2), (b) (West Supp. 2016).
    the State agreed to recommend that appellant’s punishment be assessed concurrently
    at fifteen years’ confinement. On February 1, 2016, in accordance with the terms of
    his plea bargains with the State, the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed
    his punishment at fifteen years’ confinement in each case, with the sentences to run
    concurrently.2 Appellant did not file his pro se combined notice of appeal for both
    cases until August 23, 2016. Appellant also filed several pro se letter-motions,
    including for bail and for an extension of time to file his brief, and his pro se
    appellant’s brief, in this Court. We dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction
    and dismiss the motions as moot.
    A criminal defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after
    the sentence is imposed, if the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements
    of rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. See Slaton v.
    State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    ,
    522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of
    appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. See 
    Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210
    .
    Here, the trial court signed appellant’s judgments of conviction in both cases
    on February 1, 2016, and imposed the concurrent sentence on that date. Appellant
    2
    See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.32(a) (West Supp. 2016).
    2
    did not timely file a motion for new trial or extension of time to file a notice of
    appeal, making his notice of appeal due by March 2, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    26.2(a)(1). Appellant’s combined notice of appeal was not filed until August 23,
    2016, more than six months after the judgment was signed. See 
    id. Thus, under
    these circumstances, we can take no action other than to dismiss these appeals for
    want of jurisdiction.3 See 
    Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210
    ; 
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 526
    .
    Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Lloyd.
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    Moreover, even if appellant had timely appealed, these appeals must be dismissed
    because the trial court’s certifications state that these are plea-bargained cases and
    that he has no right of appeal in either case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The
    special clerk’s records, filed in this Court on November 15, 2016, in each case,
    support the trial court’s certifications. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-16-00705-CR

Filed Date: 12/8/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/12/2016