Raghunath Dass, P.E. v. Texas Board of Professional Engineers ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                 ACCEPTED
    03-14-00552-CV
    5436756
    THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    5/27/2015 2:53:47 PM
    JEFFREY D. KYLE
    CLERK
    NO. 03-14-00552-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS              FILED IN
    FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT AUSTIN, 3rd COURT
    TEXAS   OF APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    ___________________________________5/27/2015 2:53:47 PM
    JEFFREY D. KYLE
    RAGHUNATH DASS, P.E.,                        Clerk
    Appellant,
    v.
    TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS,
    Appellee.
    ___________________________________
    On Appeal from the
    201st Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas
    ___________________________________
    MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLANT’S EXHIBIT 7
    _____________________________________
    TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:
    Now comes Appellee, Texas Board of Professional Engineers (“Board”), and
    files this Motion to Strike Appellant’s Exhibit 7 and would show as follows:
    I. INTRODUCTION
    When appellant Raghunath Dass, P.E., (“Mr. Dass”) filed his appellant’s brief
    with the Court he attached several documents as his appendix. One of the documents,
    Exhibit 7, is not part of the administrative record in the instant matter; and the Board,
    therefore, asks the Court to strike this document.
    II. ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITY
    A.     The Administrative Record in this proceeding does not contain
    Exhibit 7.
    As explained in the Board’s Brief, the administrative record for the suit for
    judicial review underlying the instant case contains only the following four
    documents: (1) Board’s Amended Final Order; (2) Respondent’s Motion for
    Rehearing; (3) Staff Memorandum to Board Members on Motion for Rehearing; and
    (4) Notice to Respondent Overruling Motion for Rehearing. These documents were
    provided to the Court by the district clerk. Appellee’s Br. 14-15.
    In the district court case, Mr. Dass filed a motion seeking to have the Board
    file with the district court the transcript from the contested case hearing underlying
    the first suit for judicial review. See Mot. for Def. to File SOAH Tr. with Dist. Clerk,
    dated Apr. 21, 2014, C.R. at 59-61. The Board opposed this motion. C.R. at 99-202.
    The transcript was not part of the administrative record, and the district court properly
    granted the Board’s motion to strike these documents.
    The district court denied both Mr. Dass’s motion to supplement the record with
    the SOAH transcript and PFD and his supplemental motion seeking the same
    supplementation. C.R. at 316, 318. The court also granted the Board’s Amended
    Motion to Strike. C.R. at 317.
    Page 2 of 5
    Mr. Dass then filed a bill of exception, seeking to have this Court determine
    whether the administrative record in the first suit could be considered by the Court.
    Supp. C.R. II at 12-13.
    B.     A court may not consider documents not part of the clerk’s record.
    A court may not consider documents that are not part of the clerk’s record. See,
    e.g., Barker CATV Const. v. Ampro, Inc., 
    989 S.W.2d 789
    , 795-96 (Tex. App.—
    Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (concluding that the court may not consider
    documents that are not part of the clerk’s record); Tex. R. App. P. 34.
    C.     The Court would first have to rule on the district court’s excluding
    the transcript, but this issue has been waived.
    As noted in the Board’s brief, Mr. Dass failed to brief his issue regarding the
    exclusion of evidence. Appellee’s Br. 43. Thus, Mr. Dass waived the issue of whether
    the trial court erred in excluding the transcript, and the transcript is not properly
    before the Court.
    III. PRAYER
    The Board respectfully requests that its Motion to Strike Exhibit 7 be granted.
    Respectfully submitted,
    KEN PAXTON
    Attorney General of Texas
    CHARLES E. ROY
    First Assistant Attorney General
    Page 3 of 5
    JAMES E. DAVIS
    Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation
    DAVID A. TALBOT, JR.
    Chief, Administrative Law Division
    /s/Jennifer L. Hopgood
    Jennifer L. Hopgood
    Assistant Attorney General
    State Bar No. 24073010
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
    TEXAS
    Administrative Law Division
    P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
    Austin, Texas 78711-2548
    Telephone: (512) 936-1660
    Facsimile: (512) 320-0167
    jennifer.hopgood@texasattorneygeneral.gov
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE,
    TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
    ENGINEERS
    Page 4 of 5
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    I certify that I have conferred with Jimmy Alan Hall by telephone on this day,
    May 27, 2015, and he is opposed to withdrawing the exhibit that is the subject of this
    motion to strike.
    /s/Jennifer L. Hopgood
    JENNIFER L. HOPGOOD
    Assistant Attorney General
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and forgoing
    document has been served by e-service on this date, the 27th day of May 2015, on
    the following:
    Jimmy Alan Hall
    JIMMY ALAN HALL, P.L.L.C.
    4600 Mueller Boulevard, Suite 2121
    Austin, TX 78723-3372
    Facsimile: (512) 857-9195
    jahall@fbjah.com
    J. Woodfin Jones
    ALEXANDER DUBOSE JEFFERSON
    & TOWNSEND LLP
    515 Congress Avenue, Suite 2350
    Austin, Texas 78701-3562
    Facsimile: (512) 482-9303
    wjones@adjtlaw.com
    Counsel for Appellee
    /s/Jennifer L. Hopgood
    JENNIFER L. HOPGOOD
    Assistant Attorney General
    Page 5 of 5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-14-00552-CV

Filed Date: 5/27/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016