Haven Lanier Hodges v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-15-00313-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    HAVEN LANIER HODGES,                                      §   APPEAL FROM THE 114TH
    APPELLANT
    V.                                                        §   JUDICIALDISTRICT COURT
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    APPELLEE                                                  §   SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, a first degree felony. In accordance with
    the terms of Appellant’s plea agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced Appellant to
    imprisonment for fifteen years. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
    We have received the trial court's certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and
    Appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification also states that
    Appellant waived her right to appeal. The certification is signed by Appellant and her trial
    counsel. The clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615 (Tex Crim. App. 2005). Therefore, this court does not have jurisdiction of the
    appeal, and the appeal must be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Opinion delivered December 30, 2015.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (DO NOT PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    DECEMBER 30, 2015
    NO. 12-15-00313-CR
    HAVEN LANIER HODGES,
    Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the 114th District Court
    of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114-1228-15)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
    considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and
    that the appeal should be dismissed.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this
    appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be
    certified to the court below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-15-00313-CR

Filed Date: 12/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016