Margaret Jane Griffith v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                   CRIMINAL APPEALS - CERTIFICATE
    To Be Filed with Court of Appeals
    TRIAL COURT NO.: B09-09
    FILED IN
    STATE OF TEXAS                                                        IN THE DISTRICT  COURT'
    4th COURT        .
    OF APPEALS
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    Vs.                                                                            06/12/2015
    198th JUDICIAL      10:50:04 AM
    DISTRICT
    KEITH E. HOTTLE
    Margaret Jane Griffith                                                OF KERR COUNTY,   Clerk
    TEXAS
    1. Date Notice of Appeal filed in Trial Court:     May 15 th , 2015
    2. Has a motion for new trial been filed:     X      Yes   _ _ _No         Date Filed:- - - - - -
    ---"'-'=--
    Will a motion for new trial be filed:                         _ _No            X     (Unknown)
    - - -Yes
    3. Date of Judgment signed: April 20th, 2015
    4. The Honorable: M. Rex Emerson presided at trial.
    5. The Defendant is represented by: M. Patrick Maguire, Bar No. 24002515
    327 Earl Garrett Ste 103. Kerrville, Tx 78028 Phone: 830-895-2590
    6. The State is represented by: Scott Monroe Bar No. 14272700
    402 Clearwater Paseo, Ste. 500, Kerrville, Tx 78028 Phone: 830-315-2460
    7. Defendant's Counsel is _ _Retained          X    Appointed ___Pro se
    8. Defendant was convicted in this court of the offense of: Delivery of a Controlled Substance Penalty
    Group One -1-4 GR. Enhanced and Habitual
    9. Name & Address of Court Reporter: Paula Beaver, PO Box 233, Comfort, Tx 78013
    10. The trial was before the Court: Without a Jury X , A Jury on both Guilt &         Punishment~,
    A Jury on Punishment Only _ _ , A Jury on Guilt Only_ __
    11. Sentence was imposed/suspended on: April 20th , 2015 Punishment assessed: 40 Years in the
    Institutional Division-TDCJ
    Witness my hand this the 12th day of June, 2015.
    Robbin Burlew
    Kerr County District Clerk
    FILED {~       (so:    20J,.C
    C   'fii8 6L       M
    ROBBIN BukLEW
    Dlstr.· Cle    rr County, TX
    NO. B09-09                 fACI.~""'``LIooIIi- _put)'
    STATE OF TEXAS                            §   IN THE DISTRICT COURT
    §
    vs.                                       §   198TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    §
    MARGARET GRIFFITH                         §   KERR COUNTY, TEXAS
    NOTICE OF APPEAL
    TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
    Now comes Margaret Griffith. Defendant in the above styled and numbered
    cause, and gives this written notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals of the State of
    Texas from the judgment of conviction and sentence herein rendered against Margaret
    Griffith.
    Respectfully submitted,
    M. PATRICK MAGUIRE, P.C.
    Attorney and Counselor
    945 Barnett Street
    Kerrville, Texas 78028
    Tel: (830) 895-2590
    Fax: (83 895-2594
    By:_....:.....-_...::!-_1.......::~_---1~___t---+--
    M. Patrick Maguire
    State Bar No. 24002515
    mpmlaw@ktc.com
    Attorney for Margaret Griffith
    ..
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    This is to certify that on May 14, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and
    foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Kerr County, 402
    Clearwater Paseo, Suite 500, Kerrville, Texas 78028, by facsimile transmission to (830)
    315-2461.
    CAUSE NO. B09-09
    TIlE STATE OF TEXAS                                §            IN TIfE DISTRICT COURT
    VS.                                                 §                198m JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    MARGARET JANE GRIFFI1lf                             §                KERR COUNTY. TEXAS
    TRIAL COURT'S CERTIFICATION OF DEFENDANT'S RIGHT OF APPEAL
    I, Judge of the trial court, certify this criminal case:
    ~ot a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has the right of appeal. [or]
    is a plea-bargain case, but matters were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial and not
    withdrawn or waived, and the defendant has the right ofappeal. (or]
    is a plea-bargain case, but the trial court has given permission to appeal, and the defendant has the right
    ofappeal. [or]
    is a plea-bargain case. and the defendant has NO right of appeal. [or)
    I have received a copy of this certification. I have also been informed of my rights concerning any appeal of
    this criminal case, including any right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review pursuant to Rule 68
    ofthe Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. I have been admonished that my attorney must mail a copy ofthe
    Court ofAppeals's judgment and qlinion to my last known address and that I have only 30 days in which to file
    a pro se petition for discretionary review in the Court ofAppeals. Tex. R App. P. 68.2 I acknowledge that, ifI
    wish to appeal this case and if I am entitled to do so, it is my duty to inform my appeUate attorney, by written
    communication, of any change in the address at which I am cum:ndy living or any change in my current prison
    unit. I understand that. because of appellate deadlines. ifl fiJi) to timely inform my appellate attorney of any
    change in my address, I may lose the opportunity to file a pro se petition for discretionary review.
    ``
    Mailing address:
    Defendant's Counsel
    State Bar ofTexas identification number:
    Telephone number:                                             Mailing address:
    Faxnwnber (ifany):                                            Telephone number:
    Fax number (if any):
    Cause No. B09..Q9
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                      §              IN THE 198TH JUDICIAL
    V.                                                      §              DISTRICT COURT OF
    MARGARET JANE GRIFFITH                                  §              KERR COUNTY. TEXAS
    ADJUDICATION OF GUILT:
    SENTENCE To Institutional Division, TDCJ
    FIL``9toQ~ ~1S
    DATE OF JUDGMENT:                  April 20, lOtS
    JUDGE PRESIDING:                 M. REX EMERSON
    ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE:                scon F. MONROE
    ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANT:                 PEIIY CORTESE
    OFFENSE:                 DElIVERY OF A CONTIOLlED SUasTANCE PENALTY GIOUP
    ONE - 1-4 GI. ENHANCED AND HABITUAL
    STATUTE FOR OFFENSE:                Adlcle 481.1120, Sedion     • Health and Safety Code
    DEGREE OF OFfENSE:                 first Degree felony
    APPLICABLE PUNISHMENT RANGE                    Hablual OIfender (25·" yrs or lie In prison)
    Iinciuding enhancements if any):
    DATE OF OFFENSE:                SEI'I'fMBEI 25, 2009
    DATE OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION ORDER:                      NOVEMBER 2. 2009
    CHARGING INSTRUMENT:                  Indictment
    TERMS OF PLEA AGREEMENT                   NONE
    (IN DETAIL):
    PLEA TO MOTION TO ADJUDICATE:                    True
    FINDING AS TO ALLEGATIONS IN MOTION TO                     Tree
    ADJUDICATE:
    CONDITIONS OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION                       As set out In State's exhibit A
    VIOLATED
    (as set out in the motion 10 adludlcatel:
    AFFIRMATIVE FINDING ON DEADlY WEAPON                       Not AppIc:abIe
    OTHER AFFIRMATIVE SPECIAL FINDINGS:                    Drugs/alcohol affected this crtme
    DATE SENTENCE IMPOSED:                 APlll20.2015
    PUNISHMENT AND PLACE OF CONFINEMENT:                       40 yean In the InstIuIIonai Dlvislon·1DCJ,
    TIME CREDITED TO SENTENCE:                  296dars
    COURT COSTS:                 $80
    TOTAL AMOUNT OF RESITTUTION:                  $
    NAME AND ADDRESS FOR RESTITUTION:
    noB: 0810511964                      SS#: 45343-3961                SID#: tx 03720700
    This sentence shall run conculfenllv unless oIhetwIse speclled.
    On the date stated above, the Defendaol eIdered a plea of Gai.1 ty to the offense stated above and was
    granted a deferred adjudication in the above numbered and styled cause. The Defeudant was placed on community
    supervision as stated above, subject to the oonditions or supervision set out in the order in Ibis cause. Thereafter.
    and during the period of supervision, the State filed a motion to acljudicate in Ibis cause, aIIeging thai the Defendant
    had violated conditions of supervision set out in said order.
    On the date stated above, the above numbered and eotitled cause was regularly reached and called for a
    hearing on the motion to adjudicate. and the State appeaacd by the attorney stated above. and the Defendant and the
    Ddendant's attorney, as stated above, were also pn:sent. TbaaJPOD boIh sides aJIIlOI.UK:ed ready for the hearing.
    and the Defendant, Defendants attorney, and the Defeodaot waived the reading of the motion to adjudicate, and,
    upon being asked by the Court as to bow the deCendaDt pleaded, entered a plea of True to the allegations in the
    motion to revoke.
    AdjudicatioD or Guilt; Direct Senlenc:e; Page 1 of 2 Pages
    Thereupon. the Ddendant was adm(wisIIaI by the CGurI of the coosequeaces of the plea; it appeared to the
    Court that the Dcf'endam was awnpc:tad and . . the dcl:. . . . . . DOl bdIuenced in making said plea by any
    consideration of fear or by an persuasion pIOIIIpdug said pica; and the Court received the ftee and voluntary plea,
    which is now entered of reconl in the miDub::s of the court. The Court, after hearing all of the evic:Ience for the State
    and the Defendant and arguments of coonseI. was of the opiDioa and fbund that the Defendant violated the
    conditions of community supervision as Slated ~
    The Court then adjudK:ated the Defendald guilty of the otIease Slated above and found the offense was
    ,r
    committed on the date stated above. A pre-sc::DtaIce iIrvesti.pOon ftlPOI1 ....... ftqIIiftd doae. After bearing
    additional evidence on the issue ofpunishmenl, if any. the CGurI that aS5tSStd pmrishmmt as Slated above.
    And thereupon the Court asked the Dere:adal:lt whether the DcfeIIdaal bad anytbing to say why said
    sentence shouldnot be pl'OIIOUDCCCl upon said Deli,...., aad the Defeadaot answered DOthing in bar thereof.
    Whereupon the Court proceeded to pl'CIIIOII1Ice cer*DCe ..... said J:)efaw:IB as Slated. above.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJ1..J.DGIID aad DECltEIID by the CGurI that the ctetf:ndant is guilty of the
    offense stated above, the p"nishment is fixed as stIIIIal aIJme, aad the State of Texas do baYe and recover of said
    defendant all comt costs in this prosecution exp"JQ04, for which exccutioo will issue.
    It is ORDERED by the Court that the Derendam be taken by the audaimI agerl of the State of Texas or
    by the Sheriff of this county and be safely OOIM:JCCI aad dcIM:nxI to the Dindor. ~ Di'Visioa-TDCJ,
    there to be confined in the JIIIIDDCr and for the period aforesaid. and the said defendant is hereby remanded to the
    custody of the Sheriff of this COUDly UDIiJ such time as the Sbaijf can obey the directioos of this sentence. The
    defendant is given credit as stated above on this serdmce for the time speat in ClOUDly jail. The Defendant also is
    ordered to pay restitution to the persoo(s) ....... above in the amount specified above.
    Signed on the 20· day of April, 2015.
    M                   N, JUDGE PRESIDING
    Defendant's right tInunbprint
    -•••
    •
    •
    •••
    Atljudication of Guilt; Direct Sentence; Page 2 of 2 Pages
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15-00358-CR

Filed Date: 6/12/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016