in the Interest of T.A.N.M. and A.J.F., Children ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                               NUMBER 13-14-00591-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    IN THE INTEREST OF T.A.N.M. AND A.J.F., CHILDREN
    ____________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 25th District Court
    of Gonzales County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria
    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
    Appellant, Jesse Manuel Flores, by and through his attorney, attempts to appeal
    from a judgment rendered on July 28, 2014, terminating his parental rights to T.A.N.M.
    and A.J.F, minor children. Appellants did not file a notice of appeal until September 22,
    2014. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    On October 14, 2014, this Court notified appellant, pursuant to Texas Rule of
    Appellate Procedure 42.3(a), that his notice of appeal was untimely. The Clerk of this
    Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if
    it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that the
    appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if the defect was not corrected within
    ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s notice. Counsel has failed to file a
    response.
    On July 28, 2014, the trial court entered an order terminating appellant’s parental
    rights. By statute and by rule, an appeal from such an order is accelerated. TEX. FAM.
    CODE ANN. § 109.002(a) (West 2014); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a)(2). In an accelerated
    appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the judgment or order
    is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). Unlike an ordinary appeal, the deadline for filing a
    notice of accelerated appeal cannot be extended by filing a motion for new trial, motion
    to modify judgment, motion to reinstate, or a request for findings of fact and conclusions
    of law. See 
    id. R. 28.1(b);
    In re K.A.F., 
    160 S.W.3d 923
    , 927 (Tex. 2005); see also In re
    B.G., 
    317 S.W.3d 250
    , 252–53 (Tex. 2010). However, an appellate court may extend
    the time to file the notice of appeal, if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the
    notice of appeal, the party files the notice of appeal in the trial court and files in the
    appellate court a motion for extension of time that complies with the appellate rules. TEX.
    R. APP. P. 26.3; see In re 
    K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d at 926-27
    . Further, a motion for extension
    of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of
    appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period
    provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner,
    
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617-18, 619 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). In such
    2
    a case, the appellant must provide a reasonable explanation for the late filing; it is not
    enough to simply file a notice of appeal. 
    Id. Appellant’s notice
    of appeal was due to have been filed on August 18, 2014, but
    was not filed until September 22, 2014. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not
    filed by the due date or within fifteen days of the due date, we lack jurisdiction over this
    appeal. We DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    PER CURIAM
    Delivered and filed the
    6th day of November, 2014.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-14-00591-CV

Filed Date: 11/7/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2014