Alfred F. Valenzuela v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                           ACCEPTED
    04-15-00356-CR
    FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    6/22/2015 10:39:22 AM
    KEITH HOTTLE
    CLERK
    NO. 04-15-00356-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS            FILED IN
    4th COURT OF APPEALS
    FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS      6/22/2015 10:39:22 AM
    KEITH E. HOTTLE
    ALFRED F. VALENZUELA,                      Clerk
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    APPELLANT’S RESPONSE TO THE ORDER PROPOSING TO DISMISS
    THIS APPEAL FOR NO RIGHT OF APPEAL
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Comes now ALFRED F. VALENZUELA, Appellant, by and through
    undersigned counsel, in reply to the order of this Honorable Court dated June 17,
    2015, shows the Court the following:
    I.      Procedural history:
    Appellant was charged by indictment in cause number 2013-CR-9521 for
    the offense of assault-family violence-second offense (habitual), alleged to have
    been committed in Bexar County, Texas, on or about August 24, 2013. (CR, 4).
    On November 17, 2014, pursuant to a written plea agreement with the State,
    Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to the reduced offense of assault-family
    violence-second offense (repeater). (CR, 5-9). As part of the plea agreement,
    Appellant waived the right of appeal in writing. (CR, 9). On March 31, 2015, the
    trial court, the Honorable Lorina Rummel presiding, followed the terms of the plea
    agreement and sentenced Appellant to a term of five years’ of confinement in the
    Texas Department of Criminal Justice – Institutional Division, with a fine of
    $1,500. (CR, 45-46). The trial court certified that this is a plea-bargain case, and
    Appellant has “NO right of appeal.” (CR, 44). By his signature, Appellant
    acknowledged that he was informed that he has no right of appeal in this case. (CR,
    44).
    Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, file-marked on June 9, 2015, but
    with an unsworn declaration dated April 22, 2015, and bearing a postmark of April
    29, 2015. (CR, 47-49). This notice of appeal was timely under the “prison mailbox
    rule.” Taylor v. State, 
    424 S.W.3d 39
    , 43-44 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). On June 11,
    2015, the trial court appointed the Bexar County Appellate Public Defender to
    represent Appellant in this attempted appeal.
    II.      No right of appeal:
    Appellant has no right of appeal. As noted above, Appellant pleaded nolo
    contendere to the charged offense pursuant to a written plea agreement with the
    State. (CR, 5-9). As part of the plea agreement, Appellant waived the right of
    appeal in writing. (CR, 9). The trial court certified that this is a plea-bargain case,
    and Appellant has “NO right of appeal.” (CR, 44). Appellant signed that notice.
    (CR, 44).
    2
    Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The
    appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of
    appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P.
    25.2(d). The undersigned attorney has reviewed documents including the electronic
    clerk’s record of this case and can find no right of appeal for Appellant. See TEX.
    R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2) (in a plea-bargain case where the sentence did not exceed the
    agreed-upon punishment, the defendant may appeal only: matters raised by written
    motion and ruled upon before trial; or after getting the trial court’s permission to
    appeal). Therefore, this Court has no choice but to dismiss the appeal. See Chavez
    v. State, 
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)(where defendant has no
    right to appeal after his plea bargain, dismissal of the appeal is required, with no
    inquiry by the appellate court into even possibly meritorious claims); Monreal v.
    State, 
    99 S.W.3d 615
    , 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)(a valid waiver of appeal will
    prevent a defendant from appealing without the consent of the trial court).
    III.     Relief available to Appellant:
    Although the Court of Appeals is required to dismiss this this appeal,
    Appellant may file an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article
    11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, after the mandate is issued. It
    should be noted that if Mr. Valenzuela is granted habeas relief, his plea bargain
    3
    would no longer be applicable, and he could possibly face the full habitual
    offender range of punishment.
    WHEREFORE, Appellant, by and through undersigned counsel, is
    compelled to concede that the Honorable Court of Appeals and must dismiss this
    appeal for the reasons stated above.
    Respectfully submitted,
    /s/ Michael D. Robbins
    MICHAEL D. ROBBINS
    Assistant Public Defender
    Paul Elizondo Tower
    101 W. Nueva St., Suite 370
    San Antonio, Texas 78205
    Bar No. 16984600
    (210) 335-0701
    FAX (210) 335-0707
    mrobbins@bexar.org
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and
    foregoing response has been emailed to the Bexar County District Attorney’s
    Office, Appellate Division, Paul Elizondo Tower, 101 W. Nueva St., Suite 710,
    San Antonio, Texas 78205, on June, 2015.
    /s/ Michael D. Robbins
    MICHAEL D. ROBBINS
    Assistant Public Defender
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15-00356-CR

Filed Date: 6/22/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016