Pegues, Jason Tyrone ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • '_|L, ij (IZ``O_§)O%Q§‘
    MR. JASON T. PEGUES #728196
    HUNTSVILLE UNIT
    815 12th STREET
    HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS 77348
    JULY 15,2015
    TO: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    CLERK OF THE COURT: ABEL ACOSTA
    P.O. BOX 12308
    CAPITOL STATION
    AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
    Re: EX parte JASON TYRQNE PEGUES V. THE STATE OF TEXAS
    IN REFERENCE TO CAUSE NO.94-DCR-OZ6185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HC&
    [wR-74,762-03¢oosz-7é,762-Oa¢¢¢le-7£",762_05]»
    DEAR CLERK OF THE COURT:
    ENCLOSED IS A COPY OF A MOTION THAT WAS FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT IN
    REFERENCE TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED CAUSE NUMBERS AND WRITS. IF YOU WILL
    PLEASE FILE THIS IN THE COURT SO THAT IT MAY BE TAKEN INTO
    CONSIDERATION UPON HEARING AND RULING, I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IT.
    THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ASSISTANCE.
    SPECTFUL SUBMITTED,
    /.¢1(7#%£
    AsoN7TY§0NE/PEGUES #72§§%6
    APPLICANT.
    1 RE@EWE® QN
    ©@UR'\T OF CPFMHNAL APPEALS
    JUL 17 2015
    AF@@HA©@SE@,©H@W<
    lofl
    No.94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HCA
    WR-74,762-O3....WR-74,762-Oh....WR-74,762-05
    NOTICE TO THIS HONORABLE COURT
    EX PARTE
    Jason T. Pegues
    mw’mmw’mmw’m
    THE FOLLOWING IS TO INFORM THIS HONORABLE COURT THAT A MOTION HAS
    BEEN FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT, AND THAT THE APPLICANT HAS SENT A COPY
    TO THIS HONORABLE COURT. IN SUPPORT OF SUCH MOTION.SEE:
    EX parte POND,418 S.W.3d 94 n.13 (TEX.CRIM.APP.ZOIB):
    Best practices include filing all materials with the
    Trial Court before the Trial Judge has signed his
    Findings of Fact and made his Recommendation
    to this court. But an Applicant is not foreclosed from
    amending or supplementing his materials even after
    application is forwarded to this court, as long as those
    materials are filed in the Trial Court.
    #728?96
    CC/FILE: APPLICANT:
    .5\``<. "
    affidavit that was attached to and refers ched in t.
    N§.ga~ntR-ozsias aca and 9a-nca¢ozslasrncq
    §
    § IN THE 2a0ch DISTRICT count»,§§
    §
    Ex Parte
    aaaon TYRQNE PEGUES §
    ~ ' oF
    §
    § _
    `` '§ sent BENn couNTY; TEXAS
    Applicent’s Motion Requesting The Court ?o
    Hold.HC3 and 304 For 30 Days so Applicant Can
    Supplement and Amend The Applications
    Comes now, Jason Tyrone Pegues #728196, Applic ant, Pro-se, in the
    above styled end numbered cause of action respectfully file this
    Motion Requesting The Court To Hold 9a~DCR~026185 HCS and HC& so the
    'Applicant CannSupplement Amend the Applications due to the
    reconsideration of 96-DCR-026185 HCS and 94»DCR~026185 HC& by this
    court based on the perjury made by attorney Cary M.Faden in his first-
    "J'
    ¢'3
    CQ
    tate‘s earlier
    res ponds to both third and fourth writs of havens ccrpus. The
    applicant would also like to show this chorable Court the following:
    PROCEDURAL HISTORY
    Applicant filed his initial application ll.O7 (HCB) around
    §§E£g§£zm lolZOlé and on Au§ust_ 27, _2014, the €ourt of Griminal appeals
    _..--_.
    denied the writ without written order. On December 10, 201&, applicant
    '“¢_u-.--_.``¢-.,--_~_¢-
    'filed a szb assn ment application 11.07 C3CA)[WR~ 7A,762- -Oa] and on
    `` March 442015 the Court OF Criminal Appeals Dismissed the application
    without written order, in which this court reconsidered (HC&) and on
    June_lG¢Z§l§, the Court of‘Criminsl Appeals Dismissed 804 {WR-7&,762-
    a
    _d5g!without written order. Applicant then filed a post-conviction
    Motion For Forensic DNA Testing, and upon the State Inves tigating the
    DNA Testing Motion, on Ju§§‘lg_ggl§, the State filed. a Supplémental‘
    :Amended Ans"er and Supplemental Amended Findings of Fact & Conclusione
    ’of Law, Reconsidering the applicant' s applications QA-DCR- 026185 HC5
    and 94-DCR-026185 HC& due to the perjury and error made by attorney&
    Cary M.Fadsn in his first affidavit which was attached and referenced
    .in the State's responses to applicant’s third and fourth writs, and
    for the Respondent contacting Judge Devid Newell regarding his
    thodghts on the enplicent's third application.
    PUR?OSE GF HOTION
    Due to the reconsideration of the applicant°s third and fourth”
    writ for haheas corpus based on the State's perjury and errcr, the
    applicant is requesting that this Honorable Court hold the applicant's
    applications HCS end HCQ for 30 days from the date of filing this
    Motion so that applicant can Supplementaand Amend the applications
    which sets recons'deze d. See Ex ?arte ?GND,elS S=H.Bd 95 n.13 (Tex.
    §§i&;飣i§§l§)‘
    Best practices include filing all materials with the
    Trial'Court before the Trial Judge has signed his
    _Findings of Fact and made his Recommendation
    to this Court. But an Applicant is not foreclosed from
    amending or supplementing his materials even after
    Application is forwarded to this Court,ns long as those
    materials are filed in the Trisl Court.
    The applicant also request that the applicant be appointed to’
    counsel based on the facts, the record, surfacing the many unresolved
    issues in the current proceedings of this case g§l§§. With the
    -¢2-
    epslicant being Pro~se and laymen of the law, there ere some filings
    that can be filed unknown to the applicant which could assist bin in
    these proceedings or harm him , Upon being appointed counself‘the
    applicant request that the appointed counsel do not file enythin;
    until the applicant and the appointed counsel have discussed all'i
    area’
    \'.D
    of the proceedings, asking this Honorable Court to order the
    appointed counsel to show proof that the applicant end appointed
    counsel have done as such.
    Lastly, the applicant request anLive Evidentiery Heering based on
    .jx
    the credibility of all those who have responded to the hebeas_corpus
    cproceedings as well se the DNA lasting Metion Investigetion that is
    d ,.
    currently active in this cese.astmorney Cary M.Faden was very aware of
    what the DNA test results were because he wes the one who cross~
    ex mined the crime lab ciiminalist Monica Thompson. The bottom line
    m
    5
    is t at if the avplicent would not have filed a Motion For ?crensic
    DNA Testing, attorney Cary M.Faden's perjury would not have possibly``
    ever came to light. So the question is what other lies have been told
    and how long have these false end slendering statements been stated.
    ()
    Out of all these pr ceedings, the applicant only request for a New
    Punishment'&earing* Howeeer, fectuslly, legally, sss procedurally there
    are some unresolved issues thstqneeds to be addressed and fairly
    adjudicates.
    ' males
    HHEREFORB PREHISES CCH$IDERED, epplicsnt, JaHon Tyrone Pegues'#728196,
    respectfully prays that this Honorable Court grant this Motion
    requesting the court to hold HC3 and HC& for 30 Days so applicant can
    Supplement and Amend the applécaticns, as well as aspoint the
    applicant to counsel for the habeas proceedings and DNA Testing
    proceeding. Baaqd on the perjury and error by the State, questions the
    etdibility of those representing the State who have spoken and responded in
    proceedings pertaining to this case §§l§§.TThe applicant prays that this
    Honorable Court agrees that a Live Evidentiary Heating is reasonable and
    entitled to the applicant. Over-all the applicant prays that this Honorable
    Court heve mercy and grant this Motion that has been presented respectfuliy
    to this Honorable Court.
    EXECUTED ON THIS l5th
    .--~
    day of gggg,zols.
    Respectfully Submitted,
    %W¢Z
    .soH T. §EQHES #723193 éz“
    HUNTSVILLE UN:T
    alzth 12th sTREET
    HUNTSV;LLE, TEXAS 773&8
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I,Jason Tyrone Pegues #728196, The applicant, being :esently confined
    in walker Couhty, Texas do hereby affirm that 1 have delivered the original
    of this Motion Requestin@ The Court.To Hold HE$ and HC& For 30 Days 30
    Appg§pant Can Supplement and Amend The Applications to the prison mailroom
    -officials for delivery to the §oilowing via U.S.Postal Service;
    THE DISTRICT CLERK, ANNIE REBECCA ELLIOTT
    OF FORT BEND COUNTY
    ZAOth JUDICIAL DISTBICT COURT
    HONORABLE JUDGE THOMAS R.CULVER,III
    301 JACKSON STREET
    RICHMOND, TEXAS 77&69
    A copy of this Motion has been forwarded toe
    THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    ?.0. Box 12308
    Capitol Station
    Austin, Texas 78711
    ’£iley
    ccffile:
    INHATE DECLARATION
    I,JASON TYRONE PEGUES #728196, Presently inearcezated in Walker County,
    Texas hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the above
    mentioned in my Motion Requestlng 'be €ourt To Hcld 803 and HC& For"
    30 Day§ so Applicant Can Supple§enteénd Amend TEe Application§ is true
    and correct.
    Si;ned on this liga day of §§LX,ZOlS.
    Respectful ”rbmitted,
    7: zQy/%
    ASOH T. PEGUES #728196 x
    Applicant:
    HUNYSVILLE UNIT
    8;5 12th sTREET
    HHNTSVILLE, TEXAS ?73a3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-74,762-03

Filed Date: 7/17/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016