in Re Ernest Ray Koonce ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                ACCEPTED
    01-15-00228-CV
    FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    7/28/2015 4:59:41 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    FILED IN
    1st COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    7/28/2015 4:59:41 PM
    No. 01-15-00228-CV and    01-15-00440-CV
    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    Clerk
    ________________________________________________________________
    IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS
    ________________________________________________________________
    IN RE ERNEST R. KOONCE, RELATOR
    ________________________________________________________________
    Original Proceeding From the 127th Judicial District Court of Harris
    County, Texas
    Cause No. 2010-64752
    __________________________________________________________________
    OBJECTION TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
    ERNEST R. KOONCE
    RELATOR, Pro Se
    15938 Fleetwood Oaks Drive
    Houston, Texas 77079
    Page 1 of 7
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:
    Ernest R. Koonce, Relator, and those similarly situation,
    respectfully submit this Objection to Real Party In Interests and
    Respondent, Wells Fargo’s Motion to Consolidate both cases, and
    would show the Court as follows:
    IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL
    Relator, Ernest R. Koonce, hereby certifies that the following are the
    list of parties and their respective counsel, if any, to the best of his
    knowledge and understanding of the rules.
    PARTIES                                     COUNSEL
    Relator
    ERNEST R. KOONCE                            Pro Se
    Respondent
    HONORABLE RK SANDILL                        127thth Civil District
    Court of Harris County, TX
    201 Caroline, 10th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    Court Phone Number:
    (713) 368-6161
    Chris Daniels                               201 Caroline
    Harris County District Clerk                Houston, Texas 77002
    Real Party in Interest:
    WELLS FARGO BANK, NA                        Bradley Chambers
    Texas Bar No. 2400186
    Valerie Henderson
    Texas Bar No. 24078655
    Baker, Donelson,
    Bearman, Caldwell &
    Berkowitz, P.C.
    1301 McKinney Street
    Suite 3700
    Page 2 of 7
    Houston, Texas 77010
    Tel: (713) 650-9700
    Fax: (713) 650-9701
    vhenderson@bakerdonelson.com
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Petition and Realtor, Ernest Ray Koonce, hereby objects to the
    untimely filed motion of Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo’s attorney, Valerie
    Henderson, had previously contacted Petition/Realtor Ernest Ray
    Koonce (hereinafter referred to as “Koonce”) prior to any payment
    for the Writ of Mandamus. At that time, Koonce agreed because he
    was lead to believe that Valerie Henderson was going to immediately
    file the motion so as to avoid paying additional fees. When no
    motion was actually filed, Koonce believed it was because
    Henderson had changed her mind. Had Koonce not been tricked
    into believing that motion would be timely filed, Koonce never would
    have agreed to it. The following email is a true and correct copy of
    the original from an email Koonce received from Valerie Henderson
    on June 15, 2015:
    On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Henderson, Valerie
     wrote:
    Mr. Koonce:
    We are preparing our response to your recent pleading
    “Petition for Permission to Appeal Amended Order
    Page 3 of 7
    Reversing the Granting of Plaintiff’s Plea to the
    Jurisdiction and Standing of Wells Fargo Bank, NA or
    Alternative, Petition for Writ of Mandamus” and noticed
    an error by the appellate court that we wanted to discuss
    with you. We presume you filed that recent pleading in
    response to the appellate court’s April 30 order. The
    clerk, however, docketed the pleading in a different cause
    number and is now asking you to pay another filing fee.
    You should have been mailed a copy of the Court’s order
    on June 11. In case you have not yet received it, I am
    attaching a copy to this email.
    We have prepared a motion to consolidate the appeals:
    (1) 01-15-00228-CV and (2) 01-15-00440-CV.
    If the court grants our motion, you should not have to
    pay a second filing fee.
    We are required to ask whether you are opposed to our
    motion to consolidate the appeals.
    Please let me know.
    Valerie G. Henderson
    Associate Attorney
    Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
    1301 McKinney Street
    Suite 3700
    Houston, Texas 77010
    Direct: (713) 286-7172
    Facsimile: (713) 650-9701
    E-mail: vhenderson@bakerdonelson.com
    www.bakerdonelson.com
    Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
    represents clients across the U.S. and abroad from offices
    in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi,
    Tennessee, Texas and Washington, D.C.
    Page 4 of 7
    What is clear from the above email, Valerie Henderson
    specially states that “if the motion is granted, you should not have
    to pay the second fee.” The only reason Koonce agreed to the
    motion was to avoid paying that second fee. However, since Valerie
    Henderson intentionally waited until the time she was required to
    file and lied to Koonce about her intention, this Court should deny
    the motion or, require Henderson to pay Koonce the additional fee
    he was required to pay. Koonce had to pay an additional $145.00
    filing fee for the Writ of Mandamus, a fee which Koonce should not
    have had to pay if Henderson had timely filed the motion as she
    claimed she would. It would be fundamentally unfair at this point
    to allow the two cases to be consolidated after fees had been paid,
    and Valerie Henderson misrepresenting her intentions and
    misleading Koonce into believing that the motion would be filed
    right away. This is a habit of Ms. Henderson in misrepresenting
    facts, evidence, and statements. She should not be rewarded for
    her lies.
    Therefore, Koonce objects to the untimely filing of the Motion
    to Consolidate, for Henderson’s misrepresentations to this Court,
    and withdraws his prior agreement since Henderson breached that
    Page 5 of 7
    agreement. Koonce further objects because counsel failed to
    provide a word count in accordance with the Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.
    PRAYER
    Koonce prays that this Court deny Respondent/Real Party In
    Interest Wells Fargo Bank, NA’s Motion to Consolidate, or should
    the Court grant this untimely motion, which consent was procured
    through misrepresentations and means of fraud, that Henderson be
    required to reimburse Koonce for the additional filing fee, and for
    such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and
    proper.
    Respectfully submitted:
    /s/ Ernest R. Koonce
    Ernest R. Koonce
    15938 Fleetwood Oaks Dr.
    Houston, TX 77079
    Tel: (832) 434-3183
    Rayk469@gmail.com
    Word count: 945
    Page 6 of 7
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    On July 28, 2015, pursuant to Rule 21(a) of the Texas Rules of
    Civil Procedure, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document
    has been sent to the following via e-filing as follows:
    Bradley Chambers
    Texas Bar No. 2400186
    Valerie Henderson
    Texas Bar No. 24078655
    Baker, Donelson, Bearman,
    Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.
    1301 McKinney Street
    Suite 3700
    Houston, Texas 77010
    (713) 650-9700 – Telephone
    (713) 650-9701 – Facsimile
    vhenderson@bakerdonelson.com
    Page 7 of 7
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00440-CV

Filed Date: 7/28/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016