-
j , jgj$§j ’O?’ Crimina| Appeals Court of “the State of Texas" City of Austin 201 E 14th St, Austin, TX 78701 ln the matter of: WR-75,351-02 Date Filed: n RECEi\/ED lN 05/06/2015 t CGURT CF CRlP.'llNALAPPEALS CaS€ Typ€j JUL 217 2815 Orlginal Writ of Habeas Corpus Sty|e: Abet Frcsste, Clerl< Ralph-Kenneth: Evans: a man Changed by the court to a corporate artificial persons EVANS, RALPH KENNETH v.: `` This STATE The Writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right, and shall never be suspended The Legislature shall enact laws to render the remedy speedy and effectual , Petitror'r For``finding of Fact.and Law __ b 4 _ '_ of writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right , - Motion ( No motion was filed by m_e | a'm not an attorney some attorney must have filed it fqr a corporate artificial persons E_VANS R_ALPH KENNETH) for leave .to_ file denied W|THQUT order. l Ralph- Kenneth a man filed a petition per myl right for Habeas cbrpus. `` Now l again ask this Court for its supervisory authority over the lower courts and agents aka attorneys alleged t_o be officers of the Courts. Members of the Bar Corporation not registered to do business in “the State of Texas" pursuant to the office of the Secretary of State The magistrate of the municipal court of Grand Saline has acted Without jurisdiction With the attorneys ``and police officer Burns did place me in jail which is not harmless error. Burns has stated that he Will arrest me if l come into his town Without a driver’s license l\/ly l_iberty has been restricted since l\/lay 2, 2015 since the day he kidnapped me took me to jail and had the sheriff hold me for two days a magistrate judge was present at the jail When he had the jailers lock -me up'wlthout or Grand Jury inductment.. He has my liberty restraint by his terrorist threat by threat of man stealing and kidnapping lt is evident that the municipal court’s agents of Grand Saline are running a tax extortion racketeering racket for no drivers license which does not exist in the State of Texas pursuant to case law and Vernon’s law They are also running an extortion on the people claiming that the speed signs posted for commercial drivers that haul goods and people for hire apply to the none commercial drivers that are only travelling from place to place and tax them also This ve``ry tax racketeering is going on all over the State of Texas in the Courts lt affects all the non.-_- . commercial people that are travelling _The cities and counties send out_ their armed agents to arrest the people and drag them in to their courts and fine them for not having a driver s license and for travelling non- commercially faster then the posted commercial speed signs Without any damage to anyone including anyone s property They levy a tax fine on them and if they are unable to ply they put them in debtors prison and charge the Tax payer $200- $300 DOLLARS A DAY allowing the ‘ ' |~‘. ' v prisoners credit of $100.00 a day till the tax fine is paid in full. That is criminal racketeering in a nut shell. No Court, Judge, attorney or agent has jurisdiction to use the courts for criminal racketeering Case law "A court cannot confer jurisdiction Where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. lt is clear,and well established law that a void order can be challenged in any court", OLD WAYNE l\/lUT. L. ASSOC. v. l\/chONOUGH,
204 U. S. 8,
27 S. Ct. 236(1907). Defense of lack ofjurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal." Hil| Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp.
478 So. 2d 368(Fla 2nd DCA 1985) Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “lnasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind onlyl a government can interface only with other artificial persons The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity With the tangible The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as Well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (
3 U.S. 54;
1 L.Ed. 57;
3 Dall. 54), l have no contract With this State or “the State of Texas’l or any of its agencies l am not a registered Voter l\/ly right to a 7"‘ amendment trial has been denied Which is forever inviolate This Writ affects the rights of ever Citizen in “the State of Texas”. Served by first class mail to the Criminal Appeals Court of “the State of Texas" City of Austin 201 E 14th St, Austin, TX 78701 and by fax. This 24th day of July 2015 by me ,.~L ~ ' Kenn l\/lai| location exact and certain: 171 Private Road 5710 Hold for: Ralph-Kenneth Grand Saline, Texas State near {75140} Non-resident raised seal:
Document Info
Docket Number: WR-75,351-02
Filed Date: 7/27/2015
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/29/2016