Albert Dotie, Jr. v. State ( 2015 )

ACCEPTED
06-15-00094-CR
SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS
TEXARKANA, TEXAS
7/27/2015 2:20:06 PM
DEBBIE AUTREY
CLERK
NO. 06-15-00094-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN
6th COURT OF APPEALS
TEXARKANA, TEXAS
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS
7/27/2015 2:46:00 PM
DEBBIE AUTREY
AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS Clerk
ALBERT DOTIE, JR.,
Appellant
VS.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
Appealed from the 276th Judicial District Court
Marion County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F14540
BRIEF OF APPELLANT
Submitted by:
James P. Finstrom
Counsel for Appellant
P.O. Box 276
Jefferson, Texas 75657
903-665-7111
Fax: 903-665-7167
State Bar #07038000
APPELLANT DOES REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL
Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 38.1(a)
Appellant: Albert Dotie, Jr.
Institutional Division of Texas Department
of Criminal Justice
Joe F. Gurney Unit
1835 FM 3328
Tennessee Colony, Texas 75803
Appellant’s Counsel for Appellant at trial and on appeal:
Hon. James P. Finstrom
P.O. Box 276
Jefferson, Texas 75657
State’s Counsel at trial and on appeal:
Hon. Angela Smoak, County Attorney
102 West Austin Street
Jefferson, Texas 75657
Trial Judge:
Hon. Robert Rolston, Judge,
276th Judicial District Court
Marion County, Texas
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 38.1(b)
Page
IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES 4
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 5
ISSUE PRESENTED 5
STATEMENT OF FACTS 5
ISSUE NO. 1: IS THE EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN
THE APPELLANT’S CONVICTION?
ISSUE NO. ONE (Restated) 9
IS THE EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN APPELLANT’S
CONVICTION?
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT 9
ARGUMENT (Issue No. 1) 11
PRAYER 14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 15
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 15
3
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 38.1(c)
Cases: Page
Green v. State, 350 S.W.3d 617 12
(Tex.App. – Houston 14th Dist. 2012, p.d.r. ref.)
Martin v. State, 252 S.W.3d 803 12
(Tex.App. – Texarkana 2008, no pet.)
Mills v. Bartlett, 377 S.W.2d 636 (Tex. 1964) 11
Rios v. State, 141 S.W.3d 750 11
(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2004, p.d.r. ref.)
Silber v. State, 371 S.W.3d 605, 613 11
(Tex.App.—Houston 1st Dist. 2012, no pet.)
Simpkins v State, 300 S.W.3d 860, 12
(Tex.App.—Texarkana 2009, no pet.)
Whitney, 472 S.W.2d 524 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971) 11
Statutes:
Article 62.051(a), Code of Criminal Procedure 12
Article 62.102, Code of Criminal Procedure 11
All references to Texas statutes, rules, etc. are to the latest
edition published by West Publishing Company, unless otherwise
noted.
4
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 38.1(d)
Appellant was tried by a jury on May 4, 2015, on his plea of not
guilty to an indictment alleging the third degree felony offense of
failure to timely register a change of address as a sex offender
alleged to have occurred on or about December 21, 2013. (CR 4, 7)
The jury found him guilty and assessed a four (4) year sentence in
the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
on May 5, 2015. (CR 27-28) Appellant gave timely notice of appeal
on June 2, 2015. (CR 32) Counsel was appointed to represent
Appellant on January 14, 2014, which appointment has continued
through this appeal. (RR 5-6)
ISSUES PRESENTED
Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 38.1(e)
ISSUE NO 1: IS THE EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN
APPELLANT’S CONVICTION?
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 38.1(f)
The State called four witnesses and the Defendant testified and
called one other witness.
Deronda Riley, the administrative assistant court clerk and, as
such, the sex offender registrar for the City of Jefferson, testified that
5
Appellant had a reportable conviction for indecency with a child and
had been reporting to her as a resident of Jefferson, Texas, for at
least fourteen years. (RR 12-14) At the time of this case, Appellant
was reporting to Ms. Riley annually. (RR 15) Ms. Riley met with
Appellant on December 10, 2013, when he reported a change of
primary address to 408 Saint John, Jefferson, Texas, and a
supplemental address of 305 West Watson, Jefferson, Texas. (RR
14-15) On December 22, 2013, she received information that
Appellant had used the address of 1406 FM 2208, Jefferson, Texas,
but did not remember Appellant reporting that address to her seven
days prior to using it and did not remember if he had any explanation.
(RR 16-21) Appellant returned to her office on January 8, 2014 and
again on January 10, 2014, when he reported a new change of
address to her. (RR 17) She believed that Appellant had moved less
than seven days before he reported his change of address and
violated his registration requirements and she reported this to Deputy
Quada at the Marion County Sheriff’s Department. (RR 17) Ms.
Riley did not remember if Appellant offered her any explanation for
the change of address to 1406 FM 2208. (RR 21) And she did not
know if any officer had gone to 305 West Watson or 408 Saint John
6
to see whether or not Appellant had moved. (RR 21) When
Appellant returned to Ms. Riley’s office on January 13, 2014, he was
arrested for the offense alleged in this case. (RR 24)
Deputy Marion County Sheriff David Quada testified that he
received a telephone call from Appellant on January 3, 2014, to
report a change of address outside the city limits of Jefferson and he
told Defendant to report the change first to Deronda Riley within ten
days. (RR 42, 45-46) He did not ever verify the change of address
by going to the new address or the old address but believed that a
Deputy Riehl had. (RR 48-49) However, Deputy Riehl never
testified.
Paula Bradshaw, who was Appellant’s girl friend’s mother,
testified that she did not see Appellant after he moved from her house
at 808 Canal Street until January 30, 2014, and she did not know
where he was living. (RR 51) She did not know for certain where he
lived and did not know that he had reported a change of address to
305 W. Watson on December 10, 2013. (RR 55)
Joyce Guess, rented a mobile home to Jennifer Smith, who was
Appellant’s girlfriend, on December 18, 2013. (RR 58-59, State’s
Exhibit 3). Appellant signed the lease later a few days after Jennifer
7
Smith signed it. (RR 59) She had a conversation with Appellant
when he told her that he was a sex offender and had a duty to
register a change of address if he moved. (RR 63-64) Guess never
actually confirmed that Appellant was living there at her mobile home
and she never saw him very often. (RR 65-66, 68)
Appellant’s employer, Charles McCoy, testified that he was
picking Appellant up from his home when Appellant was arrested in
January, 2014, and that he may have picked him up at the address
on FM 2208 twice prior to his arrest in this case. (RR 73-74) The
rest of the time, McCoy picked Appellant up at the bar-b-que place
downtown and assumed he was living near there. (RR 74-75)
Appellant testified that the bar-b-que place was about 50 feet from his
residence. (RR 82-83)
Appellant testified that he and Jennifer Smith went to
Shreveport to his brother’s funeral and he was arrested there on
December 18, 2013, after his brother’s funeral. (RR 81) At the jail in
Shreveport, he was putting his address on the jail records and told
the officer he was moving to another place, but had not moved yet
and the officer told him to use the new address where he was going
to be living so that they could get in contact with him. (RR 81-82) He
8
further testified that until he moved, he would be living near the bar-b-
que place. (RR 82) At the time he got arrested in this case, he had
spent about three separate nights with Jennifer at the address on FM
2208. (RR 84-85) Appellant testified that he went to report the
change of address to the FM 2208 address before he moved and was
told he would have to come back later. (RR 88-90) He got arrested
when he came back to change his address and said that he did not
move into the FM 2208 address until he got out of jail and after he
reported the change of address. (RR 91-92, 108) He also testified
that he had tried to report the change of address earlier but was told
that he had to get papers from Deronda Riley, and that there was no
reason he would not have reported the change of address before he
moved in. (RR 108)
ISSUE NO. ONE
(Restated)
IS THE EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN APPELLANT’S
CONVICTION?
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT
Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 38.1(g)
Appellant had been timely reporting changes of address for at
least fourteen years before this case allegedly occurred and
9
recounted many of these changes to the jury. (RR 18-21, 79-80) He
testified that he did not move in this case before he changed his
registration and that any nights he stayed away from his residence
were temporary and less than seven days. (RR 84-85) His
employer, who picked him up to go to work, confirmed this. (RR 72-
77) The State relied upon an address given by Appellant when he
was placed in jail in Lousiana but wholly failed to rebut Appellant’s
testimony that they wanted a good mailing address rather than his
actual address if he was going to move to the new address in the
near future. (RR 81-82) All of the State’s evidence is equivocal and
no witness ever went to Defendant’s registered address to verify that
he had moved from it or to his new address to verify when he in fact
moved in there and stayed for more than seven days. Appellant was
trying to register his new change of address when he was arrested.
(RR 91-92, 10-8) Careful analysis of the testimony shows that the
evidence is insufficient to sustain Appellant’s conviction because it
does not rebut his testimony that he tried to report his change of
address as required before he moved and was told to go to see
Deronda Riley first and that he actually had reported his change of
address before he moved.
10
ARGUMENT
Pursuant to T.R.A.P. 38.1(h)
Issue No. 1
In Silber v. State, 371 S.W.3d 605, 613 (Tex.App.—Houston 1st
Dist. 2012), the court held that “a registered sex offender is not
required to spend every spare moment and every night at their
registered address. See Whitney, 472 S.W.2d 524 at 525
(Tex.Crim.App. 1971), where the Court of Criminal Appeals held that
residence is an elastic term and the meaning that must be given to it
depends upon the circumstances surrounding the person involved
and largely depends upon the present intention of the individual.
And, see Mills v. Bartlett, 377 S.W.2d 636 (Tex. 1964), which held
that neither bodily presence alone nor intention alone will suffice to
create the residence, but when the two coincide, at that moment the
residence is fixed and determined. In Mills, as in the case at bar, the
evidence is not clear that Appellant made the FM 2208 address his
residence less than seven days before he was arrested.
There must be a determination based on the particular facts
and circumstances of the case that Appellant failed to register within
the requirements of Art. 62.102, Code of Criminal Procedure. As in
Rios v. State, 141 S.W.3d 750 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2004), there
11
was conflicting testimony as to where the defendant was living and
his actual residence was not verified if it was different from his
registered address, and thus the evidence was insufficient to sustain
the conviction in that case. And, as in Green v. State, 350 S.W.3d
617 at 630-635 (Tex.App. – Houston 14th Dist. 2012), the court made
a careful analysis of the evidence as to an address change found that
no rational fact finder could have found beyond a reasonable doubt
that appellant ever had an intent to change his address that he failed
to report not later than the seventh day before the date of the
intended address change. See also Simpkins v State, 300 S.W.3d
860, 862-65 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 2009, no pet.) and Martin v.
State, 252 S.W.3d 750, 753-54 (Tex.App. – Texarkana 2008, no pet.)
In Simpkins, at page 862, this Court noted that Article
62.051(a), of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure defines the
location of registration:
A person who has a reportable conviction or adjudication or who is
required to register as a condition of parole, release to mandatory
supervision, or community supervision shall register or, if the person
is a person for whom registration is completed under this chapter,
verify registration as provided by Subsection (f), with the local law
enforcement authority in any municipality where the person resides or
intends to reside for more than seven days. If the person does not
reside in a municipality, the person shall register or verify registration
in any county where the person resides or intends to reside for more
than seven days.
12
Appellant had been living in the municipality of Jefferson, Texas, but
intended to move to an address outside the city but in Marion County.
He went to the deputy sheriff who handled registration in the county
and was told that he had to first report the change to Deronda Riley at
the city police department. He went to Deronda Riley who was out
when he called there and he was told to return later. He did return
later to register the new address and was arrested, although he
testified that he had not moved into the new address yet at that time.
This testimony was not rebutted by anyone who checked to see that
he had moved out from his old address or had in fact moved into his
new address. The burden of proof is on the State and never switches
to the Appellant, as is required by the court’s charge to the jury in this
case. (RR 18) No witness for the State was able to testify
unequivocally that Appellant was not staying at the residence for
which he was registered or that he had been staying at the new
address for more than seven days or that it was more than a mailing
address for him. No city police officer or sheriff’s deputy or civilian
witness could testify of their own personal knowledge or as a result of
their own personal investigation that Appellant violated the statutory
registration requirements. Appellant’s testimony that he had not yet
13
moved as of date of his arrest in this case was simply not rebutted so
as to sustain the jury’s verdict. His conviction must be reversed and
judgment of acquittal entered.
PRAYER
Upon the issue presented, Appellant, Albert Dotie, Jr., prays
that this Court reverse the judgment of the trial court and render a
verdict of not guilty, and for such other and further relief to which he
may be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
_/s/James P. Finstrom____
James P. Finstrom
Counsel for Appellant
202 S. Marshall,
P.O. Box 276
Jefferson, Texas 75657
903-665-7111
Fax: 903-665-7167
Texas Bar #07038000
14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I have delivered a true copy of this brief to Hon.
Angela Smoak, counsel for the State, and to Appellant by United
States mail, first class postage prepaid, at the Joe F. Gurney Unit,
1385 FM 3328, Tennessee Colony, Texas 75803, on this 27th day of
July, 2015.
__/s/James P. Finstrom___
James P. Finstrom
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I certify that Appellant’s Brief filed electronically on this 27th day
of July, 2015 complies with Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B). This Brief
contains 2,556 words.
/s/ James P. Finstrom
James P. Finstrom
15