Andre Brooks v. State ( 2015 )

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed January 12, 2015.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00261-CR
ANDRE TARWEN BROOKS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F13-15689-U
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Myers
Andre Tarwen Brooks appeals following the adjudication of his guilt for aggravated robbery
with a deadly weapon, a firearm. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). The
trial court assessed punishment at forty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney
filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a
professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to
advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).
Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to