Benny Cavazos Valverde v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                              ACCEPTED
    04-14-00338-CR
    FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    7/9/2015 9:52:04 AM
    KEITH HOTTLE
    CLERK
    No. 04-14-00338-CR
    BENNY C. VALVERDE,                       §          IN THE FOURTH FILED
    DISTRICT
    IN
    4th COURT OF APPEALS
    Appellant                                §                         SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    §                        07/09/15 9:52:04 AM
    v.                                       §          COURT OF      APPEALS
    KEITH E. HOTTLE
    §                                Clerk
    STATE OF TEXAS,                          §
    Appellee                                 §          SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    STATE’S MOTION TO ABATE APPEAL AND REMAND CASE TO TRIAL
    COURT TO APPOINT AN ATTORNEY PRO TEM BECAUSE A CONFLICT
    OF INTEREST EXISTS BETWEEN APPELLANT AND THE CRIMINAL
    DISTRICT ATTORNEY
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    NOW COMES, Nicholas “Nico” LaHood, Criminal District Attorney of
    Bexar County, Texas, and undersigned Counsel for the State of Texas, and files
    this motion asking the Court abate these appellate proceedings and remand this
    case to the trial court with directions to appoint an attorney pro tem.
    I. Statement of the Case
    On May 23, 2012, Benny C. Valverde, appellant was indicted for a murder
    that was alleged to have occurred on September 4, 2011. Trial began on February
    11, 2014, and the jury returned a guilty verdict on February 14, 2014. Judgment
    was entered on March 20, 2014, and, on the same day, the trial judge certified
    appellant‟s right to appeal.
    Appellant filed his notice of appeal on April 17, 2014. After several motions
    for extension of time were granted by this court, on November 10, 2014,
    appellant‟s first appellate counsel filed an Anders brief. Subsequently, appellant‟s
    first appellate attorney withdrew as counsel, and appellant retained new counsel.
    On January 20, 2015, appellant filed a motion to withdraw the Anders brief and to
    extend time to file a substantive brief. That motion was granted. After several
    other motions were filed, on June 1, 2015, appellant timely filed his new
    substantive brief, which is currently before this court.
    On July 1, 2015, the State was granted an extension of time to file its brief in
    this case. The State‟s brief is due on July 31, 2015.
    II. An Abatement is Necessary
    “Each district attorney shall represent the State in all criminal cases in the
    district courts of his district and in appeals therefrom, except in cases where he has
    been, before his election, employed adversely.” Tex. Code Crim. Pro. Ann. art.
    2.01 (emphasis added). Thus, “if an elected prosecuting attorney has previously
    represented a defendant in a particular proceeding, then article 2.01 disqualifies
    him from representing the State in the matter and that disqualification is imputed to
    those assistants „who serve[] at his will and pleasure.‟” Scarborough v. State, 
    54 S.W.3d 419
    , 424 (Tex. App.—Waco 2001, pet. ref‟d) (quoting State v. May, 
    270 S.W.2d 682
    , 
    684 Tex. Civ
    . App.—San Antonio 1954, no writ) (per curiam)).
    2
    In the instant appeal, the elected district attorney, Nicholas “Nico” LaHood,
    while not appellant‟s trial counsel, nonetheless did once represent appellant in this
    case. (See, e.g., Reporter‟s Record vol. 5, pg. 68.) This fact has been confirmed
    by District Attorney LaHood. He is, thus, disqualified from prosecuting this case,
    including the appeal, and, accordingly, so are his assistants. As a result, this appeal
    must be abated and remanded to the trial court so that it may appoint an attorney
    pro tem for the purposes of defending the verdict on appeal.1 See Tex. Code Crim.
    Pro. art. 2.07 (authorizing the trial court to appoint an attorney pro tem if the
    district attorney is disqualified to act in any case or proceeding).
    1
    However, it must be noted that having been sworn in on January 1, 2015, District Attorney
    LaHood was not the elected district attorney when this case was tried to a verdict. Therefore, his
    and his assistants‟ disqualification only extends to any post-conviction proceedings, not the trial
    itself, and the verdict is not disturbed by this disqualification.
    3
    III. Prayer
    WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State prays that this court
    will ABATE this appeal and REMAND the case to the trial court with directions to
    appoint an attorney pro tem to represent the State on appeal.
    Respectfully submitted,
    NICHOLAS “NICO” LAHOOD
    Criminal District Attorney
    Bexar County, Texas
    _______/s/_______
    ANDREW WARTHEN
    Assistant Criminal District Attorney
    State Bar No. 24079547
    101 West Nueva Street
    San Antonio, Texas 78205
    Voice: (210) 335-2414
    Fax: (210) 335-2436
    awarthen@bexar.org
    Attorneys for the State of Texas
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, Andrew Warthen, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Bexar County,
    Texas, hereby certify that a true copy of the above and foregoing Motion was
    emailed to appellant‟s attorneys, John G. Jasuta, at lawyer1@johnjasuta.com, and
    David A. Schulman, at zdrdavida@davidschulman.com, on July 9, 2015.
    _______/s/_______
    ANDREW WARTHEN
    Assistant Criminal District Attorney
    State Bar No. 24079547
    101 West Nueva Street
    San Antonio, Texas 78205
    Voice: (210) 335-2414
    Fax: (210) 335-2436
    awarthen@bexar.org
    Attorney for the State of Texas
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00338-CR

Filed Date: 7/9/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016