Alberto R. Garza and Leticia I. Garza v. Burch Construction, Inc. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                     ACCEPTED
    13-15-00052-CV
    THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
    7/13/2015 10:48:56 AM
    CECILE FOY GSANGER
    CLERK
    No. 13-15-00052-CV
    In the                   FILED IN
    13th COURT OF APPEALS
    Court of Appeals CORPUS CHRISTI/EDINBURG, TEXAS
    Thirteenth Supreme Judicial District
    7/13/2015 10:48:56 AM
    Edinburg, Texas         CECILE FOY GSANGER
    Clerk
    ALBERTO R. GARZA AND
    LETICIA I. GARZA, INDIVIDUALLY,
    APPELLANTS
    VS.
    GARY BURCH CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
    APPELLEE
    REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS
    GARCIA & MARTINEZ, L.L.P.
    Adrian R. Martinez
    State Bar No. 13137600
    Alberto T. Garcia III
    State Bar No. 00787515
    6900 N. 10th Street, Suite 2
    McAllen, Texas 78504
    Phone: (956) 627-0455
    Fax: (956) 627-0487
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS
    ARGUMENT
    Appellee’s brief, while lengthy, still does not identify any evidence that
    establishes the accrual date of the Garzas’ nuisance claim. To dismiss this case on
    limitations grounds, Appellee had to conclusively prove that the Garzas were
    injured by a permanent nuisance. In a related appeal (hereinafter “Garza I”) this
    Court acknowledged that there was no evidence establishing that the nature of the
    nuisance was permanent when it said “[t]he Garzas did not assert in their petition,
    nor is there any evidence in the record to suggest, that the survey or the
    ‘finished floor elevation,’ having been completed in 1997, are now capable of
    being ‘repaired, fixed, or restored.’ Garza v. Melden & Hunt, Inc., No. 13-14-
    00329-CV, 
    2015 WL 2160474
    *3, May 7, 2015 (pet. filed) [emphasis added].
    Without identifying any supporting evidence in the record, this Court of Appeals in
    Garza I erroneously concluded that “it is apparent that the Garzas’ claims are based
    on a permanent condition for which ‘future injury can be reasonably evaluated.’”
    
    Id. Because the
    limitations period for a permanent nuisance begins to accrue when
    injury first occurs or is discovered, this Court of Appeals in Garza I then found that
    the Garzas’ nuisance claim accrued in 2000, eight years before the Garzas filed
    suit. 
    Id. Appellee in
    this case relies entirely on this Court’s decision in Garza I.
    Appellant has filed a petition for review (Case No. 15-0460) in the Texas Supreme
    1
    Court in Garza I because this Court of Appeals upheld the grant of summary
    judgment without any evidence in the record that established that the nuisance was
    permanent in nature. As a defendant moving for summary judgment on the
    affirmative defense of limitations, Appellee has the burden to conclusively
    establish that defense. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Hous. Fin. Corp.,
    
    988 S.W.2d 746
    , 748 (Tex. 1999). As this Court of Appeals acknowledged in
    Garza I, there was no evidence in the record that establish whether the nuisance
    was permanent or temporary so Appellee failed to establish the accrual date of the
    Garzas’ nuisance claim.
    PRAYER
    WHEREFORE,          PREMISES      CONSIDERED,      Appellants   respectfully
    request that this Honorable Court of Appeals reverse the MSJ Order insofar as it
    dismisses Appellants nuisance claims.
    2
    Respectfully submitted,
    GARCIA & MARTINEZ, L.L.P.
    6900 N. 10th Street, Suite 2
    McAllen, Texas 78504
    Phone: (956) 627-0455
    Fax: (956) 627-0487
    /s/ Albert Garcia
    ADRIAN R. MARTINEZ
    State Bar No. 13137600
    adrian@garmtzlaw.com
    ALBERTO T. GARCIA III
    State Bar No. 00787515
    albert@garmtzlaw.com
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS
    CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
    Per TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(3), I certify that the Reply Brief of Appellants
    document received by this Court on July 13, 2015, was generated by a computer
    using Microsoft Word, which indicated that the word count of this document is
    343.
    /s/ Albert Garcia
    Alberto T. Garcia III
    3
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the
    foregoing document was forwarded to the following on July 13, 2015.
    Mr. Hector J. Torres                       Via Email hjtorrespc@att.net
    LAW OFFICE OF HECTOR J. TORRES, P.C.
    200 N. 12th Ave., Suite 201
    Edinburg, Texas 78541
    Ms. Brandy Wingate Voss                    Via Email brandy@appealsplus.com
    SMITH LAW GROUP
    820 E. Hackberry Ave.
    McAllen, TX 78501
    /s/ Albert Garcia
    Alberto T. Garcia III
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-15-00052-CV

Filed Date: 7/13/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016