Lakesha Lashawn Barnes v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed August 30, 2019
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-19-00246-CR
    __________
    LAKESHA LASHAWN BARNES, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 42nd District Court
    Taylor County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 26730A
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Lakesha Lashawn Barnes has filed an untimely notice of appeal in this cause.
    She attempts to appeal from her convictions for the offenses of possession of
    methamphetamine and tampering with evidence. We dismiss the appeal.
    The documents on file in this appeal indicate that Appellant’s sentences were
    imposed on May 16, 2017. Pursuant to Rule 26.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure, a notice of appeal is due to be filed either (1) within thirty days after the
    date that sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or (2) if the defendant
    timely files a motion for new trial, within ninety days after the date that sentence is
    imposed or suspended in open court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed
    with the clerk of the trial court. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). The documents on file
    in this court reflect that Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was filed in the district
    clerk’s office on July 29, 2019—804 days after one sentence was imposed and the
    other one was suspended. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of
    a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this
    appeal. Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State,
    
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 
    860 S.W.2d 108
    ,
    110 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993).
    On July 29, 2019, when the appeal was filed in this court, we notified
    Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the
    appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We requested that Appellant
    respond to our letter and show grounds to continue. Appellant has filed a response,
    but she has not shown grounds upon which this appeal may proceed.1
    We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    August 30, 2019                                                             PER CURIAM
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
    Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.2
    Willson, J., not participating.
    1
    We note that, in her response, Appellant indicates that her court-appointed attorney failed to pursue
    an appeal on her behalf. Appellant is mistaken; the convictions that Appellant attempts to appeal in this
    cause were timely appealed and pursued by Appellant’s court-appointed attorney. See Barnes v. State,
    No. 11-17-00133-CR, 
    2019 WL 1966852
    , at *1–2 (Tex. App.—Eastland May 2, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.,
    not designated for publication).
    2
    Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland,
    sitting by assignment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-19-00246-CR

Filed Date: 8/30/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2019