-
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00349-CR IN RE Eric Ricardo TORRES, Original Mandamus Proceeding1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Delivered and filed: June 11, 2008 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On May 21, 2008, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to order respondent to set aside his 1993 judgment of conviction on the grounds that the sentence was “illegal and unauthorized” because his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum. Although the courts of appeals have mandamus jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to final post-conviction felony proceedings. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals,
802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding); In re McAfee,
53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. 1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 3039, styled State of Texas v. Eric Ricardo Torres, filed in the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas. 04-08-00349-CR proceeding). Because the complaint raised in relator’s mandamus petition relates to a final post- conviction felony proceeding, we are without jurisdiction to consider his mandamus petition. Accordingly, relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Do not publish -2-
Document Info
Docket Number: 04-08-00349-CR
Filed Date: 6/11/2008
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/7/2015