Pedrito Esquivel v. State ( 2009 )


Menu:
  • i          i       i                                                               i     i      i
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-09-00625-CR
    Pedrito ESQUIVEL,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2009-CR-1664
    Honorable Mary Román, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: November 11, 2009
    DISMISSED
    Appellant Pedrito Esquivel pleaded nolo contendere to indecency with a child by contact
    pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. As part of his plea-bargain, appellant signed a separate
    “Waiver of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is
    a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2).
    Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain
    04-09-00625-CR
    agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP . P.
    25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right
    of appeal has not been made part of the record.” 
    Id. The court
    gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial
    court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within
    thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 
    110 S.W.3d 174
    (Tex. App.–San
    Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 
    2003 WL 21508347
    (July 2, 2003, pet.
    ref’d) (not designated for publication). Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written
    response, stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the
    record and counsel’s notice, we agree appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State,
    
    154 S.W.3d 610
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record
    to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX .
    R. APP . P. 25.2(d).
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-09-00625-CR

Filed Date: 11/11/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015