William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming ( 2015 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00392-CV
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR,
Appellant
v.
SEAN D. FLEMING,
Appellee
From the 378th District Court
Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court No. 88611
ORDER
William M. Windsor’s Motion to Reduce Cost of Record is denied. Windsor
states that some of the documents are not necessary to his appeal. Windsor, as the
appellant, can designate those documents necessary to his appeal. But it is the
appellant’s burden to present a record sufficient to show reversible error without
omitting anything which could be presumed to be in support of the trial court’s
judgment. See e.g. Bennett v. Cochran, 96 S.W.3d 227, 230 (Tex. 2002). We also note,
based on our own experience with Windsor, the filing of voluminous exhibits of
questionable relevance is a problem of his own making.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Motion denied
Order issued and filed June 18, 2015
Windsor v. Fleming Page 2