William M. Windsor v. Kellie McDougald ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                 IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-15-00069-CV
    WILLIAM M. WINDSOR,
    Appellant
    v.
    KELLIE MCDOUGALD,
    Appellee
    From the 378th District Court
    Ellis County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 88611
    ORDER
    William M. Windsor’s Motion to Reduce Cost of Record is denied. Windsor
    states that some of the documents are not necessary to his appeal. Windsor, as the
    appellant, can designate those documents necessary to his appeal.      But it is the
    appellant’s burden to present a record sufficient to show reversible error without
    omitting anything which could be presumed to be in support of the trial court’s
    judgment. See e.g. Bennett v. Cochran, 
    96 S.W.3d 227
    , 230 (Tex. 2002). We also note,
    based on our own experience with Windsor, the filing of voluminous exhibits of
    questionable relevance is a problem of his own making.
    PER CURIAM
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Motion denied
    Order issued and filed June 18, 2015
    Windsor v. McDougald                                                     Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-15-00069-CV

Filed Date: 6/19/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2015