in Re Sie Joe Lann ( 2008 )


Menu:
  • i          i         i                                                                              i        i        i
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-08-00726-CV
    IN RE Sie Joe LANN
    Original Mandamus Proceeding1
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Justice
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    Rebecca Simmons, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2008
    PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
    On September 25, 2008, relator Sie Joe Lann filed a petition for writ of mandamus,
    complaining that the trial court “dismissed or abandoned” trial court Cause No. 00-09-00014-TXL.2
    In 2001, the trial court rendered judgment against relator for $3,782.36 for delinquent property taxes
    to be satisfied by a foreclosure lien. Relator appealed and on January 23, 2003 this court reversed
    the judgment against relator and remanded the case back to the trial court in Sie Joe Lann v. La Salle
    County et al., No. 04-02-00005-CV, 
    2003 WL 141040
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio January 22, 2003,
    1
    … T his proceeding arises out of Cause No. 02-03-00010-CVL, styled Sie Joe Lann v. Sharon Trigo, in the
    218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas, the Honorable Stella H. Saxon presiding, and Cause No. 00-09-
    00014-TXL, styled La Salle County, et al. v. Sie Joe Lann, et al., in the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County,
    Texas, the Honorable Stella H. Saxon presiding; however, the order complained of that was the subject of the appeal in
    Cause No. 04-02-00005-CV was signed by the Honorable Olin B. Strauss.
    2
    … Relator initially complained the trial court also “dismissed or abandoned” Cause No. 02-03-00010, but now
    concedes that the case was dismissed following a final summary judgment and is no longer before the trial court.
    04-08-00726-CV
    no pet.) (mem. op.). The case is currently active on the trial court’s docket. There being no trial
    court action or inaction complained of, relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus relief.
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-08-00726-CV

Filed Date: 12/10/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015