Kellie Grace Medina v. State ( 2008 )


Menu:
  • i          i        i                                                                i      i      i
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-08-00184-CR
    Kellie Grace MEDINA,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2007-CR-11402W
    Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding
    Opinion by:       Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
    Rebecca Simmons, Justice
    Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: December 3, 2008
    MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED
    Kellie Grace Medina appeals the judgment convicting her of theft of property with a value
    of less than $1,500, enhanced by a prior theft conviction, and sentencing her to eighteen months
    incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice – State Jail Division.
    Medina’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which
    she raises arguable points of error, but nonetheless concludes this appeal is frivolous and without
    04-08-00184-CR
    merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), High v. State,
    
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 
    436 S.W.2d 137
    (Tex. Crim. App.
    1969). Medina was provided a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was informed of her
    right to review the record and file her own brief. She has not done so.
    After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with
    counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 826-27 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Medina’s counsel and affirm the
    trial court’s judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 
    954 S.W.2d 83
    , 86 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1997,
    no pet.); Bruns v. State, 
    924 S.W.2d 176
    , 177 n.1 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
    No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Medina wish to seek further review of this
    case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, she must either retain an attorney to file a petition for
    discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary
    review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion
    for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary
    review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal
    Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See 
    id. R. 68.3.
    Any petition for discretionary
    review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    See 
    id. R. 68.4.
    Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    Do not publish
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-08-00184-CR

Filed Date: 12/3/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015