Richard A. Rodriguez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                       ACCEPTED
    04-14-00342-CV
    FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    7/6/2015 11:52:35 AM
    KEITH HOTTLE
    CLERK
    No. 04–14–00342–CV
    RICHARD A. RODRIGUEZ                                         IN THE COURT FILED
    OF APPEALS
    IN
    4th COURT OF APPEALS
    vs.                                                 4TH COURT OF APPEALS  DISTRICT
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.                                          SAN7/6/2015
    ANTONIO,11:52:35 AM
    TEXAS
    KEITH E. HOTTLE
    Clerk
    Supplemental Motion To Review the Ruling on the Amount and Type of Security
    To Suspend Enforcement of the Judgment Pending Appeal,
    With a Request for Emergency Relief Regarding a Sale on July 7, 2015
    Comes now appellant, Richard A. Rodriguez, and in this supplemental motion moves
    the court to review the ruling of the trial court on the type and amount of security to suspend
    enforcement of the judgment, and grant emergency relief, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 24.4
    and due process under Article I, section 19 of the Texas Constitution.
    Mr. Rodriguez may also be referred to as Rodriguez or appellant, and JPMorgan
    Chase Bank may be referred to as JPMC or appellee.
    I.
    On August 29, 2014, a Motion To Review the Ruling on the Amount and Type of
    Security To Suspend Enforcement of the Judgment Pending Appeal, With a Request for
    Emergency Relief Regarding a Planned Sale of Property, was filed in this court.
    A sale of the subject property at that time was scheduled for September 2, 2014, and
    as part of the motion, emergency relief was requested in the form of a stay order concerning
    the proposed sale. The sale on September 2 was canceled, and so the resolution of the
    motion and relief was then not pertinent.
    II.
    Prior to this supplemental motion, documents filed in the court of appeals in this regard
    are as follows.
    August 29, 2014: Motion To Review the Ruling on the Amount and Type of Security
    1
    To Suspend Enforcement of the Judgment Pending Appeal, With a Request for Emergency
    Relief Regarding a Planned Sale of Property. Filed by Appellant.
    September 1, 2014: Supplemental Content for the Motion To Review the Ruling on the
    Amount and Type of Security To Suspend Enforcement of the Judgment Pending Appeal.
    Filed by Appellant.
    September 2, 2014: Second Supplemental Content for the Motion To Review the
    Ruling on the Amount and Type of Security To Suspend Enforcement of the Judgment
    Pending Appeal. Filed by Appellant.
    September 3, 2014: Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Notice Regarding Ap-
    pellant Richard A. Rodriguez’s Motion To Review Order On Suspension of Enforcement
    of Judgment. Filed by Appellee.
    September 18, 2014: Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Response In Opposition
    To Appellant Richard A. Rodriguez’s Motion To Review Order Setting Security. Filed by
    Appellee.
    June 9, 2015: Appellee JPMC’s Supplemental Response In Opposition To Appellant’s
    Motion To Review Order Setting Security. Filed by Appellee.
    III.
    On June 1, 2015, JPMC requested by a letter that the district clerk issue an order of
    sale for the real property involved in this case. A certified copy is attached as exhibit ’A’.
    A public notice of a sale of the property for July 7, 2015 was published. A copy is
    attached as exhibit ’B’.
    On June 17, 2015, an opinion and judgment were issued affirming the judgment of the
    trial court.
    On July 2, 2015, Appellant filed a motion for rehearing and a motion for rehearing en
    banc.
    2
    IV.
    An issue on appeal and in the motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc involves
    the statute of limitations, a counterclaim against Appellant, and a request for a judicial
    foreclosure of a lien.
    A non-judical foreclosure of the lien and homestead property through a deed of trust
    has been barred by limitations under section 16.035(b) of the Texas Civil Practice and
    Remedies Code.
    An issue in this appeal is whether a judicial foreclosure of the lien through a counter-
    claim against Rodriguez is also barred by limitations. JPMC in its brief took the position
    that the note involved was accelerated on June 7, 2000. A counterclaim was first filed
    against Appellant on August 11, 2004. Based on those dates, a suit for foreclosure of
    the lien is barred by limitations, under section 16.035(a) and (d) of the Civil Practice and
    Remedies Code. JPMC has argued that limitations was tolled, and Rodriguez has replied
    that the tolling argument is not applicable or valid in this situation. This specific part of
    the appeal and Appellee’s argument about tolling were not directly analyzed and addressed
    in the opinion of June 17, and they are part of the motions for rehearing and rehearing en
    banc.
    If it is determined—after any rehearing, or if a petition for review is filed in the Texas
    Supreme Court and acted on—that a suit for foreclosure of the lien is barred by limitations,
    then a sale of the homestead property based on a foreclosure of that type should not take
    place.
    V.
    Appellant requests that the documents filed and noted in part II above be considered
    along with this supplemental motion, that an order be issued staying the sheriff’s sale of
    the property scheduled for July 7, 2015 beginning at 10:00 a.m., until the mandate upon the
    3
    conclusion of the appeal is handed down or until further order of the court.
    VI.
    An inquiry was made to attorneys for JPMC and in a reply it was indicated that
    Appellee is opposed to the motion.
    Prayer
    Therefore, Richard A. Rodriguez prays that this supplemental motion be filed; that it
    be considered by the court along with documents previously filed by the parties; that an
    order be issued staying the sheriff’s sale of the property scheduled for July 7, 2015 until
    the mandate upon the conclusion of the appeal is handed down or until further order of
    the court; in the alternative, that a temporary stay order be issued against the sale of the
    property at 15426 Fallow Ridge Drive, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas set for July 7,
    2015 and that any sale be further stayed while this motion for review is pending; that the
    court reporter of the 45th Judicial District Court prepare and file a record of the hearing of
    August 18, 2014 on the motion for suspension of enforcement of judgment pending appeal;
    that the district clerk be directed to prepare and file in the court of appeals an applicable
    record from the clerk’s file on the matter of suspension of the judgment on appeal, if
    appropriate; that the court direct that any supplemental pleadings or briefing be done as
    appropriate; that oral argument or other hearing be scheduled regarding this motion; that
    the court determine that Tex. R. App. P. 24.2(a)(3) applies and the lis pendens and other
    security, such as an injunction on appellant, is sufficient to preserve the property and status
    quo pending appeal; in the alternative, that the existing $12,000 amount for a deposit or
    bond on appeal to suspend the sale of the property be reduced to an amount that will not
    cause appellant substantial economic harm; that the court determine the amount of a bond,
    security, or other deposit regarding the money judgment of $441,027.10 in accordance with
    the judgment debtor’s current net worth and in an amount that will not cause appellant
    4
    substantial economic harm; in the alternative, that the issue of security on appeal regarding
    the money judgment be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings pertaining to
    net worth; that the court make other determinations and orders regarding suspension of
    enforcement of the judgment on appeal under Tex. R. App. P. 24 that it deems proper; and
    that he have such other relief, in law or equity, to which he may be justly entitled.
    Respectfully submitted,
    /s/ R. Robert Willmann, Jr.
    R. Robert Willmann, Jr.
    Attorney at Law
    P.O. Box 460167
    San Antonio, Texas 78246
    Tel 844.244.9973
    Temporary Fax 361.552.4305
    willaw@prismnet.com
    Bar No. 21655960
    5
    Exhibit A
    FILED
    6/1/2015 1C>-41:NA 8
    Donna Kay McKinney                                                                    WRIT OF EXEC. M I 0
    Bexar County District Clerk
    Accepted By: Nikki Garcia
    A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
    ATTORNEYS A N D COUNSELORS
    2001 BRYAN STREET. SUITE 1800
    DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
    Gregory Sudbury
    Attorney at Law
    June 1,2015
    Via Electronic Filing
    Bexar County District Clerk
    0 1 W. Nueva. Suite 21 7
    San Antonio, Texas 78205
    RE: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v.Richard Rodriguez; Case No. 2000-CI-12923; in the
    285th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas.
    Dear Sir or Madam:
    On March 24,2014, PlaintiffJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (-'JPMC") recovered a judgment
    against Defendant Richard Rodriguez for the amount of $441,027.10 together with post-judgment
    interest as provided by law from the date of signing ofthe judgment until paid and for foreclosure
    of JPMC's mortgage lien as it existed on the judgment date against the real property commonly
    known as 15426 Fallow Ridge Drive, San Antonio, Texas, 78248, which is more particularly
    described as:
    Lot 50, Block 2, New City Block 14292, DEERWOOD, UNIT4, in the City of San Antonio,
    Bexar County, Texas; according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 9529, Page 224;
    Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County; Texas.
    In accordance with the Judgment, please accept this letter as a request to issue an Order
    of Sale for the real property described above. With this request, JPMC is submitting payment in
    the amount of $8.00 for your fee to issue the order.
    Once the Order of Sale has been issued, please FedEx it to our office. We will be
    sending you a FedEx envelope for this purpose.
    Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions, please contact
    my paralegal, Heather Ferrill, at (214) 880-1830.
    Sincerely,
    /s/ Gregory Siidbury
    Gregory Sudbury
    4828-2059-6004, V . I
    Case Number: 2000CI12923                            Document Type: REQUEST FOR PROCESS               Page 1 o f 2
    CERTIFIED COPY CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS
    I, DONNA KAY MSKINNEY, BEXAR COUNTY DISTRICT
    CLERK, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING
    IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
    RECORD NOW IN MY LAWFUL CUSTODY. WITNESS
    MY OFFICIAL HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE ON THIS:
    July 02,2015
    DONNA KAY MSKINNEY
    BIXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
    A
    By:
    (NOT VALID WITIIOUT TEE CLERKS'S ORIGINAL SIGA'ATURE.)
    Case Number: 2000C112923                            Document Type: REQUEST FOR PROCESS   Page 2 o f 2
    Exhibit B
    Affidavit Regarding Exhibit
    State of Texas
    County of Calhoun
    Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared R. Robert Willmann, Jr.,
    who, after being duly sworn, stated as follows.
    "I, R. Robert Willmann, Jr., am over 18 years of age, am an attorney licensed to
    practice law in the State of Texas, and am otherwise competent to make this affidavit.
    I am an attorney for appellant Richard A. Rodriguez regarding a supplemental motion
    to review the ruling on the amount and type of security to suspend enforcement of the
    judgment pending appeal and with a request for emergency relief.
    Attached to this affidavit and made a part of this exhibit 'B' is a true and correct copy
    of a "public notice sheriff sale" of the property the subject of this case which I received
    from an attorney for the Appellee, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    I have personal knowledge of the contents of this affidavit and they are true and
    c~rrect.'~
    R. Robert Willmann, Jr.
    Affiant
    u
    Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 6th day of July, 2015, to which witness my hand
    and seal of office.
    3       C0mm. Exp 09/19/2016
    MYcommission expires:            [
    /     ' [(ff
    PUBLIC NOTICE
    SHERIFF SALE
    Real Estate
    State of Texas
    County of Bexar
    By virtue of an Execution and Order of Sale
    issued out of the 285th Judicial District Court
    of Bexar Coun Texas on the Istday of June
    2015. by the dterk thereof in the case of:
    JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,.
    Successor in interest to First National
    Bank of Chica o, as Trustee
    v3
    Richard Rodriguez
    CASE #2000-01-12923
    the following property, situated in the county
    of Bexar and the State of Texas and
    described as follows; to writ;
    15426 Fallow Ridge Drive, San Antonio
    Texas, 78248 (the "Prope
    more particularly described
    ) which
    as:
    Lot 50,
    is
    B l o c k 2 New C i t y B l o c k 14292
    DEERWOOD UNIT 4, in the City of s a d
    Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, according
    to the plat thereof recorded in Volume
    9529, Page 224, Deed and Plat Records of
    Bexar County, Texas.
    Levied on the 5th dav of June. 2015 and to
    be sold to satisfy th'e judgment dated the
    -Ma~c@24~201?       and,recorclgd in the minutes
    of said Court in Volume 4202, Pa. 0901 in
    favor of the plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank
    N.A       Successor i n interest to ~ i r s t
    ~ a t h a Bank
    l       of Chica o as Trustee
    recovered a ainst Richard R o ~ r uezfor i          the
    sum of ~ 4 ~ l . 0 2 7 . 1 0 :attornev% fees of
    $85,000 for 're resentation i n the trial
    court: $20,000 for reoresentation throuah
    the appeai to the court of a eals if this
    c a s e i s a p p e a l e d ; $7,500              for
    reoresentation at the ~ e t i t i o nfor review
    state in the Supreme h u r t of Texas if a
    petition for review is filed; $15,000 for
    reoresentation throuah oral argument and
    completion of proceeding i n the Supreme
    Court of Texas if oral argument is
    necessary. with interest thereon at the rate of
    5% Der annum from March 24. 2014. until
    za'o'ano al costs of s ~ iand  t it-e ' ~ ~ e r ' c o s i s
    of sale. toqether w'in a foreclos~reofa e n on
    the abov~.describedproperty.
    I the undersl ne agen or rus ee o ex
    County, hereby give no\ic: that theBex;:
    County Commiss~onersCourt and myself do
    not warrant title nor guarantee a title policy on
    this ro erty Bexar County is giving on1 as
    mucl tige a i it has. Whatever charges tzere
    are against the roperty continue on past the
    sale. and m u 8 be taken care of by the
    purchaser. Ail prospective purchasers are ut
    on notice that the property may be subjecfto
    mortgages, liens, or other encumbrance. It is
    the responsibilit of ail Prospective Purchaser
    to determine the existence of any legal
    impediments to title on the above-described
    property. The highest bidder must
    immediate1 on the first on the first Tuesday of
    JULY, 2015 tender the cash amount the high
    bid to m self as agent of trustee for Bexar
    County Following the ratification of the sale, I
    will qive a (Trustee's Sheriff's) Deed to the
    highbidder.'
    A bidder at the sale must be re istered at the
    time the sale begins with,the Sheriff, Deputy
    Sheriff, or agent conducting the sale.
    Given under my hand:
    June 5,2015
    SUSAN PAMERLEAU
    Sheriff of Bexar County, Texas
    June 15, 22, 29
    Certificate of Service
    I certify that this supplemental motion was served by–
    an electronic filing service, e-mail, and fax, to Marcie Schout, Quilling, Selander,
    Lownds, Wislett & Moser, 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201 (attorney
    for JPMorgan Chase Bank),
    on the 6th day of July, 2015.
    /s/ R. Robert Willmann, Jr.
    R. Robert Willmann, Jr.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00342-CV

Filed Date: 7/6/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016