in the Matter of the Estate of Hugh Bob Spiller ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                           ACCEPTED
    04-15-00449-CV
    FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
    SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    9/1/2015 8:12:43 AM
    KEITH HOTTLE
    CLERK
    NO. 04-15-00449-CV
    FILED IN
    4th COURT OF APPEALS
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
    FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    09/1/2015 8:12:43 AM
    AT SAN ANTONIO           KEITH E. HOTTLE
    Clerk
    IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HUGH BOB SPILLER,
    DECEASED
    On Appeal from the
    County Court of Menard County, Texas
    Under Cause No. 2013-02059
    The Honorable Joe H. Loving, Presiding
    REAGAN WILLMAN’S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
    Respectfully submitted by:
    W. Calloway Huffaker, Attorney at Law, PLLC
    By: /s Deborah S. McClure
    Deborah S. McClure
    Texas Bar No. 18562635
    P.O. Box 15125
    Amarillo, TX 79105
    Tel: (806) 463-5595 | Fax: (806) 998-5328
    Email: deborahm@huffaker-law.com
    W. Calloway Huffaker
    Texas Bar No. 10187800
    P.O. Box 968-1540 Avenue J
    Tahoka, TX 79373
    Tel: (806) 998-4863 | Fax: (806) 998-5328
    Email: arlener@huffaker-law.com
    TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:
    Appellant, Reagan Willman (“Willman”) files this response to
    Appellee Mary Lee Spiller’s Motion to Dismiss, and respectfully shows the
    Court:
    1.   The central issue on appeal is grounded on the propriety of the
    agreements made on the record which were disputed by Willman, and never
    reduced to writing signed by Willman.        The statement relied upon by
    Appellee in moving for dismissal is an integral part of the agreements made
    the basis of the appeal. Those agreements were made by Jonathan Cluck,
    Willman’s then trial counsel, and were expressly repudiated.
    2.   The relationship of an attorney to his client is one of agency,
    and, as such, is clothed with authority to adopt the procedure and method of
    transacting his client’s suit and to act for him in the prosecution or defense
    of his legal rights. He has no power to compromise his client’s suit, in the
    absence of authority to do so. McMillan v. McMillan, 
    72 S.W.2d 611
    , 612
    (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1934, no writ).
    3.   The waiver of the right to appeal was an integral part of the
    other agreements entered on the record, and does not stand alone. Those
    agreements were entered into by Jonathan Cluck, but were disputed by
    Willman in written pleadings (CR 1:789) and through his testimony on May
    6, 2015. (RR May 6, 2015 Pre Trial Hearing 2:15-16). These matters are
    apparent on the record, and will be fully briefed in Appellant’s Brief.
    4.     When, as here, the evidence reveals that the attorney did not
    have his client’s authority, the agreement will not be enforced. Cleere v.
    Blaylock, 
    605 S.W.2d 294
    , 296 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1980, no writ).
    5.    Appellee has failed in establishing a basis for dismissal of the appeal
    without the opportunity to brief the issues. Accord, Payne v. Campbell, 259
    S.W.693, 694 (Tex.Civ.App. —Austin 1924, no writ).
    6.    The Motion to Dismiss has no basis in law or in fact. The motion was
    presented to needlessly increase the costs of litigation and delay the
    proceedings. Willman has had to incur additional fees and costs to respond
    to the Motion to Dismiss, and appellate counsel has had to detract from
    preparation of Appellant’s Brief in order to address the motion properly.
    7.    Willman respectfully requests that the time to file Appellant’s Brief be
    abated pending ruling by the Court on the Motion to Dismiss, and that he be
    afforded additional time in which to prepare and file Appellant’s Brief.
    For all the foregoing reasons, Appellant Reagan Willman respectfully
    prays that this Court will abate the proceedings pending the determination of
    Appellee Mary Lee Spiller’s Motion to Dismiss, and upon review of the
    motion, overrule the Motion to Dismiss, and provide all further relief to
    which Appellant shows himself entitled.
    Respectfully submitted by:
    W. Calloway Huffaker, Attorney at Law, PLLC
    By: /s Deborah S. McClure
    Deborah S. McClure
    Texas Bar No. 18562635
    P.O. Box 15125
    Amarillo, TX 79105
    Tel: (806) 463-5595 | Fax: (806) 998-5328
    Email: deborahm@huffaker-law.com
    W. Calloway Huffaker
    Texas Bar No. 10187800
    P.O. Box 968-1540 Avenue J
    Tahoka, TX 79373
    Tel: (806) 998-4863 | Fax: (806) 998-5328
    Email: arlener@huffaker-law.com
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a copy of the foregoing Appellant’s Response to Motion
    to Dismiss was served on the identified parties by electronic filing on
    September 1, 2015.
    Tom Roberson
    P.O. Box 25
    Menard, Texas 76859
    robersonlaw@hotmail.com
    Chris Wallendorf
    722 Front Street, Suite 101
    Comfort, Texas 78013
    chrisw7@hctc.net
    Richard C. Mosty
    C. Dixon Mosty
    222 Sidney Baker, Suite 400
    Kerrville, Texas 78028
    rmosty@mostylaw.com
    cdmosty@mostylaw.com
    Mark Marshall
    marshall-law@verizon.net
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15-00449-CV

Filed Date: 9/1/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016