Syrian-America Oil Corporation, S.A. (Hereinafter SAMOCO) v. Pecten Orient Company F/K/A Pecten Ash Sham F/K/A Pecten Syria Petroleum Company ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                ACCEPTED
    01-15-00424-CV
    FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    11/4/2015 3:39:29 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    NO. 01-15-00424-CV
    FILED IN
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS      1st COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    FOR THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    11/4/2015 3:39:29 PM
    AT HOUSTON
    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    Clerk
    SYRIAN-AMERICAN OIL CORPORATION, S.A.,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    PECTEN ORIENT COMPANY f/k/a PECTEN ASH SHAM f/k/a PECTEN
    SYRIA PETROLEUM COMPANY,
    Appellee.
    ON APPEAL FROM THE
    190TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
    CAUSE NO. 2007-67830
    AGREED MOTION TO ADOPT BRIEFING SCHEDULE
    Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1, Appellant/Cross-
    Appellee Syrian-American Oil Corporation, S.A. (SAMOCO) and Appellee/Cross-
    Appellant Pecten Orient Company f/k/a Pecten Ash Sham f/k/a Pecten Syria
    Petroleum Company (Pecten) request the Court to approve an agreed briefing
    schedule in this civil appeal and cross-appeal.
    The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure do not provide a separate
    briefing schedule for cases involving a cross-appeal. Rather, under Rule 38.6, each
    party who files a notice of appeal must file an appellant’s brief. TEX. R. APP. P.
    38.6. Each party who responds to the brief would then file a response brief as an
    appellee. 
    Id. And each
    appellant may then file a reply to the appellee’s response
    brief. 
    Id. This parallel
    briefing scheme results in a total of six briefs.
    In an effort to reduce the number of briefs to be filed in this case, the
    parties have agreed upon and propose the following briefing schedule and word
    count limits, subject to the exclusions outlined in Texas Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 9.4(i)(1):
    a.      SAMOCO’s appellant’s brief shall be due no later than 30 days
    after the date the reporter’s record is filed with the Court and shall contain no more
    than 15,000 words.
    b.      Pecten’s appellee/cross-appellant’s brief shall be due no later
    than 30 days after the date SAMOCO’s appellant’s brief is filed and shall contain
    no more than 22,000 words.
    c.      SAMOCO’s appellant’s reply/cross-appellee’s brief shall be
    due no later than 30 days after the date Pecten’s appellee/cross-appellant’s brief is
    filed and shall contain no more than 12,000 words.
    d.      Pecten’s cross-appellant’s reply brief shall be due 20 days after
    the date SAMOCO’s reply/cross-appellee’s brief is filed and shall contain no more
    than 5,000 words.
    2
    The proposed word count limits comply with Texas Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 9.4(i)(2)(B)’s mandate that in civil appeals, “the aggregate of all briefs
    filed by a party must not exceed 27,000 words if computer-generated.”             The
    proposed timing of the various briefs is also consistent with Texas Rule of
    Appellate Procedure 38.6 governing the time to file appellant’s, appellee’s, and
    reply briefs, subject to possible extensions upon further motion by a party.
    The parties ask the Court to adopt this agreed briefing schedule and
    word count limits for purposes of efficiency and to reduce the number of briefs that
    the Court must review in this case. The parties have agreed to this schedule in
    advance of the filing of a complete reporter’s record in this case and thus before
    the time to file appellants’ briefs has begun to run. By this agreed motion, the
    parties do not intend to waive the right to file motions for extension of time under
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d), under appropriate circumstances.
    For all of these reasons, the parties respectfully request that the Court
    grant this motion and adopt the agreed briefing schedule set forth above.
    3
    Respectfully submitted,
    BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
    By: /s/ Macey Reasoner Stokes
    Macey Reasoner Stokes
    State Bar No. 00788253
    One Shell Plaza
    910 Louisiana
    Houston, Texas 77002
    713.229.1369
    713.229.7869 (Facsimile)
    macey.stokes@bakerbotts.com
    Lauren Tanner Bradley
    State Bar No. 24066177
    Ashley Carr
    State Bar No. 24082619
    BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
    98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1500
    Austin, Texas 78701
    512.322.2500
    512.322.2501 (Facsimile)
    lauren.bradley@bakerbotts.com
    ashley.carr@bakerbotts.com
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE/CROSS-
    APPELLANT PECTEN ORIENT COMPANY
    F/K/A PECTEN ASH SHAM F/K/A PECTEN
    SYRIA PETROLEUM COMPANY
    4
    SHIPLEY SNELL MONTGOMERY LLP
    By: /s/ Amy Douthitt Maddux
    Amy Douthitt Maddux
    Texas Bar No. 00796483
    712 Main Street, Suite 1400
    Houston, Texas 77002-3201
    (713) 490-3827
    (713) 652-3057 (fax)
    amaddux@shipleysnell.com
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT/CROSS-
    APPELLEE SYRIAN-AMERICAN OIL
    CORPORATION, S.A.
    5
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a true and correct copy of this Agreed Motion to Adopt
    Briefing Schedule was served on all counsel of record as indicated below on the
    4th day of November, 2015.
    Counsel for Appellant Syrian-American Oil Corporation, S.A.:
    John W. Stevenson Jr.
    William Robert Hand
    Stevenson & Murray
    24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 750
    Houston, Texas 77046
    (by electronic mail)
    Amy Maddux
    Shipley Snell Montgomery LLP
    712 Main Street, Suite 1400
    Houston, Texas 77002-3201
    (by electronic mail)
    Robert Godlewski
    Law Offices of Robert S. Godlewski
    3950 Braxton Drive, Suite 100
    Houston, Texas 77063
    (by electronic mail)
    D. Craig Olivier
    Olivier & Mundy, L.L.P.
    1414 West Clay
    Houston, Texas 77019
    (by electronic mail)
    /s/ Macey Reasoner Stokes
    Macey Reasoner Stokes
    6
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00424-CV

Filed Date: 11/4/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016