in the Matter of the Marriage of Sharon Knie and Gregory Knie ( 2001 )

NO. 07-01-0120-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

DECEMBER 11, 2001

______________________________



IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF SHARON KNIE AND GREGORY ALLEN KNIE



_________________________________

FROM THE 316^TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;

NO. 32,804; HONORABLE JOHN LAGRONE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant Sharon Knie appeals from a dismissal of her bill of review by which she seeks to modify a divorce decree. For the reasons we express, we dismiss the appeal.

The clerk's and reporter's records were filed on June 13, 2001. That being so, appellant's brief was due to be filed on July 13, 2001. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). By letter dated November 1, 2001, we informed appellant that we had not received a brief or a motion for extension of time to file one and that unless a response reasonably explaining that failure, together with a showing that appellee had not been significantly injured by that failure was received by November 8, 2001, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have received no response to that letter.

Accordingly, the appeal must be and is hereby dismissed.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

thFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>

  NO. 07-10-0125-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 12, 2010

______________________________

IN RE ROBERT WAYNE VEIGEL, ET AL.

RELATOR

_________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J.. and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY UNDERLYING PROCEEDINGS

            Relator, Robert Wayne Veigel, Individually and in his capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ardella Veigel Trust No. 2, seeks an emergency stay of trial proceedings set for April 19, 2010, pending a ruling on his contemporaneously filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus.  For the reasons to be set forth in our memorandum opinion to follow, Relator’s motion is denied.

                                                                                    Per Curiam