in Re: Gary Eugene Sims ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • DISMISS and DENY; and Opinion Filed June 23, 2015.
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-15-00745-CV
    IN RE GARY EUGENE SIMS, Relator
    Original Proceeding from the 282nd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F-0045450-S
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Whitehill
    Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
    Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus asserting two complaints. First, he
    contends the district clerk has not returned file marked copies of his motion to vacate the
    indictment, motion to compel and his request for settings of the motions. Second, he contends
    that the trial court has not ruled on his motion to dismiss the indictment, which he states was
    filed on April 29, 2015.
    The Court's power to issue a writ of mandamus is set forth in section 22.221 of the Texas
    Government Code. Because the Dallas County District Clerk is not a judge, the district clerk falls
    within our mandamus jurisdiction only to the extent necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See
    TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (West 2004) (writ power). None of the allegations in
    the petition suggest that the district clerk’s failure to return a copy of relator’s motions and
    request for setting threatens this Court’s jurisdiction in any manner. 1                                     Accordingly, we lack
    jurisdiction over the petition to the extent it seeks relief against the district clerk.
    With respect to relator’s complaint that the trial court has failed to rule on his motion,
    nothing in the mandamus record suggests the trial court has violated a ministerial duty in failing
    to rule on relator’s motion. No litigant is entitled to a hearing at whatever time he may choose.
    In re Chavez, 
    62 S.W.3d 225
    , 229 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). A trial court
    has a reasonable time within which to consider a motion and to rule. Barnes v. State, 
    832 S.W.2d 424
    , 426 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). On this record we
    cannot conclude the trial court has failed to rule within a reasonable time.
    We DISMISS the petition to the extent it seeks relief against the district clerk and DENY
    the petition to the extent it seeks relief against the trial court.
    /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
    ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
    JUSTICE
    150745F.P05
    1
    Relator was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to life imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed on direct
    appeal. Sims v. State, No. 08–01–00121–CR, 
    2002 WL 1482389
    (Tex. App.–El Paso July 11, 2002, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication).
    The appeal was transferred from this Court to the Eighth District Court of Appeals at El Paso pursuant to a Texas Supreme Court docket
    equalization order.
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-15-00745-CV

Filed Date: 6/24/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/24/2015