Bobby Bruner v. State ( 2019 )

Order entered September 20, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-00356-CR
BOBBY BRUNER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. MB16-31477-C
ORDER
The reporter’s record was due May 20, 2019. When it was not filed and on the motion of
appellant’s counsel, we abated the case. The trial court held a hearing and made findings of fact
on the record which we adopted. Specifically, we adopted the findings that:
 appellate counsel has made reasonable and diligent efforts to locate appellant;
 appellant has not maintained contact with counsel;
 appellant’s actions indicate a disinterest in his case and communicate an interest
in abandoning his appeal;
 appellant’s current address is unknown and not determinable;
 there are no facts before the Court indicating that appellant is now or has ever
been indigent.
Although we initially ordered the case submitted without the reporter’s record and briefs,
we later vacated our order to the extent it submitted the case. We then ordered appellant to file
written verification by September 9, 2019 that he (1) requested the reporter’s record be prepared;
and (2) paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the reporter’s record or
was entitled to appeal without paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c) (before submitting
case without reporter’s record, court must give appellant “notice and a reasonable opportunity to
cure” failure to file reporter’s record). We cautioned appellant that the failure to provide the
written verification as ordered would result in this appeal being submitted without the reporter’s
record and briefs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c), 38.8(b)(4); Sutherland v. State, 658 S.W.2d 169,
170 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983); Scotka v. State, 856 S.W.2d 790, 791 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
1993, no pet.); see also Turner v. State, No. 05-10-00182-CR, 2011 WL 522932, at *1 (Tex.
App.—Dallas Feb. 16, 2011, no pet.) (not designated for publication). To date, appellant has not
complied with our order or otherwise communicate with the Court about the appeal.
We ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record or briefs. See Sutherland,
658 S.W.2d at 170; Wilson v. State, 39 S.W.3d 390, 391 (Tex. App.—Waco 2001, no pet.). The
Court will review the existing record for fundamental error and convey its judgment in due
course. See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE