Dennis Lynch v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-14-00328-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    DENNIS LYNCH,                                             §   APPEAL FROM THE 241ST
    APPELLANT
    V.                                                        §   JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    APPELLEE                                                  §   SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Appellant pleaded guilty to evading arrest, and the trial court assessed his punishment at
    confinement for two years.
    We have received the clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s certification
    showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The clerk’s
    record also includes a copy of the written waiver of Appellant’s right to appeal, which is signed
    by Appellant and his counsel. Additionally, Appellant’s counsel for this appeal has informed
    this court that, after sentencing, Appellant waived his right to appeal. Therefore, he concludes
    the appeal must be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    See Chavez v. State, 
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
    Opinion delivered June 24, 2015.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (DO NOT PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    JUNE 24, 2015
    NO. 12-14-00328-CR
    DENNIS LYNCH,
    Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the 241st District Court
    of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 241-1310-14)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
    being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the
    appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision
    be certified to the court below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-14-00328-CR

Filed Date: 6/25/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/25/2015