Jennings, Harvey v. Texas, the State Of ( 1994 )


Menu:
  •                               Qlxmrt at Appeals
    JTtftlj Btstrtrt of ®exns at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant                    Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90-
    No. 05-90-01121-CR               V.           03319-KH).
    Opinion delivered per curiam before
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                  Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris.
    Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.
    Judgment entered May 13, 1994.
    (SIxmrt of Appeals
    Wxftij Btstrtrt of Qkxas at lallas
    JUDGMENT
    HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant                    Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90-
    No. 05-90-01122-CR                            03321-KH).
    Opinion delivered per curiam before
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                  Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris.
    Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.
    Judgment entered May 13, 1994.
    Corner---'—•>
    S A. BAKER
    CE
    (Hourt of Appeals
    \.
    Wxfttf Ststrtrt of Qkxas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    /
    HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant                   Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90-
    No. 05-90-01123-CR               V.           03320-KH).
    Opinion delivered per curiam before
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                  Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris.
    Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.
    Judgment entered May 13, 1994.
    Cfifyfoytd-
    S A. BAKER
    ICE
    (£aixrt of Appeals
    Txftlf Btstrtrt of Okxas at Ballas
    JUDGMENT
    HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant                    Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F90-
    No. 05-90-01124-CR               V.           03322-KH).
    Opinion delivered per curiam before
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee                  Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris.
    Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.
    Judgment entered May 13, 1994.
    Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 13, 1994
    In The
    (tfrmrt of Appeals
    JTtftlf Itsirtrt of Okxas at Dallas
    No.   05-90-01121-CR
    No.   05-90-01122-CR
    No.   05-90-01123-CR
    No.   05-90-01124-CR
    HARVEY JENNINGS, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. F90-03319-KH, F90-03321-KH, F90-03320-KH,
    F90-03322-KH
    OPINION PER CURIAM
    Before Justices Baker, Ovard, and Morris
    Harvey Jennings entered open pleas of guilty to four charges of aggravated robbery.
    Appellant pleaded true to an enhancement paragraphin each case. The trial court accepted
    appellant's pleas of guilty and true. The trial court assessed appellant's punishment at
    fifteen years' imprisonment in cause number 05-90-01121-CR, thirty years' imprisonment
    ........   W"S&B"v^iW'i'S'iiS
    in cause numbers 05-90-01122-CR and 05-90-01123-CR, and forty-five years' imprisonment
    in cause number 05-90-01124-CR. The court assessed a fine of $10,000 in each case.
    Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeals are wholly
    frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the records showing why,
    in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant.
    We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se brief.
    In March 1991, appellant informed this Court that he wanted to file a pro se brief.
    We granted appellant extensions of time to June 24, 1991 to file his pro se brief. The trial
    court informed us that appellant received copies of the records. On March 30, 1994, we
    informed appellant he had thirty days to file his pro se brief or his appeals would be
    submitted without his pro se brief. As of the date of opinion, appellant has not filed his pro
    se brief. We decide the appeals without appellant's pro se brief.
    We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are
    frivolous and without merit. We find nothing inthe records that might arguably support the
    appeals.
    We affirm the trial court's judgments.
    PER CURIAM
    Do Not Publish
    Tex. R. App. P. 90
    901121F.U05
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-90-01121-CR

Filed Date: 5/13/1994

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015