Trotter, Hillman Leslie v. Texas, the State Of ( 1998 )


Menu:
  •                                                                   FILED IN
    COURT OF APPEALS
    DEC 0? 1998
    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALc^lS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. 73*244
    EX PARTE HILLMAN LESLIE TROTTER, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    FROM DALLAS COUNTY
    The opinion was delivered per curiam. Meyers, J., dissents.
    OPINION
    This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to
    Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of possession of cocaine and his
    punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction, was assessed at thirty years
    imprisonment. This conviction was affirmed, Trotter v. State, No. 05-92-1693-CR
    (Tex.App. - Dallas, delivered August 23, 1993, no pet.).
    Applicant contends that he was denied an opportunity to file a petition for
    discretionary review because his appellate attorney did not notify him that the
    (,4Bg^*"*"l«^'*«!«^S'^:«Jjyi;;W»' s*h«b*v••--•«?.>•«<
    TROTTER - 2
    conviction had been affirmed or what he needed to do to file such a petition. An
    affidavit filed by appellate counsel states that counsel has no record any notice of the
    affirmance was sent to Applicant. The trial court has recommended that Applicant be
    granted an opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review.
    Therefore, Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 
    965 S.W.2d 25
    (Tex.Cr.App. 1997). The proper remedy in a case such as this is to return Applicant
    to the point at which he can file a petition for discretionary review. He may then follow
    the proper procedures in order that a meaningful petition for discretionary review may
    be filed. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall
    be calculated as if the Court of Appeals' decision had been rendered on the day the
    mandate of this Court issues.             We hold that should Applicant desire to seek
    discretionary review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petition is filed in
    the Court of Appeals within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.
    PER CURIAM
    DELIVERED: December 2, 1998
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    Meyersv J-» dissents
    8
    a
    p
    CO 25
    <
    w    w
    04 U
    CU Pi
    r< W
    En §
    O       O
    U
    H
    p; o cn
    5 o o
    ssmisara    «
    O
    U
    WJ M
    LD
    oaiaosaad   O                    »
    m w w ,.
    '-
    O Ln p               B
    pi           O
    m   to
    .< W H ><
    en Pi pi J
    h W £ J
    J J O <                   m
    UUP
    i
    O
    W
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-92-01693-CR

Filed Date: 12/2/1998

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015