Anthony Bradley v. State ( 2002 )

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-02-00036-CR ______________________________



ANTHONY CRAIG BRADLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

---

On Appeal from the No. 3 Criminal District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court No. F00-24066J

---

Before Cornelius, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ. Opinion by Chief Justice Cornelius

O P I N I O N

Anthony Craig Bradley has filed a motion asking this Court to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.2, his motion is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

William J. Cornelius

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: April 30, 2002

Date Decided: April 30, 2002

Do Not Publish

ndParaMark/>

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                                                ______________________________

                                                             No. 06-11-00055-CV

                                                ______________________________

                 IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.E. AND M.L.B., CHILDREN

                                            On Appeal from the County Court at Law

                                                             Fannin County, Texas

                                                       Trial Court No. FA-11-40171

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

                                                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Vanessa Reed brought an attempted interlocutory appeal from an order denying her plea to the jurisdiction in this case under the Texas Family Code.  We contacted counsel by letter explaining that it did not appear that the ruling was one that was subject to an interlocutory appeal, and providing a ten-day window during which she could show the Court how it had jurisdiction over the appeal.  We also warned her that in the absence of an adequate response, the Court would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  No response has been filed.

            Reed has now filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the ruling, and pursuant to her request, the record has been transferred from this appeal to the mandamus proceeding.

            We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                        Bailey C. Moseley

                                                                        Justice

Date Submitted:          July 6, 2011

Date Decided:             July 7, 2011