Francis Charlene Golston A/K/A Charlene Davenport v. State of Texas ( 2002 )

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-01-00031-CR ______________________________



FRANCIS CHARLENE GOLSTON, a/k/a CHARLENE L. DAVENPORT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

---

On Appeal from the 188th Judicial District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 27550-A

---

Before Cornelius, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ. Opinion by Justice Ross

O P I N I O N

Francis Charlene Golston, a/k/a Charlene L. Davenport, appeals her conviction for theft of money in an amount over $1,500.00. The trial court sentenced her to two years' confinement in a state jail facility. The record reflects that Davenport pleaded guilty before the court without a plea agreement. Davenport was represented by appointed counsel.

Davenport was tried simultaneously on two separate prosecutions and has appealed from both convictions. The same issues raised in this case were also raised in a companion case, No. 06-01-00030-CR, which has been decided this date.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case, the judgment in this case is likewise affirmed.

Donald R. Ross

Justice

Date Submitted: January 11, 2002

Date Decided: January 30, 2002

Do Not Publish

="sotseal3.gif" width="139" height="137" border="0">

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-06-00145-CR

______________________________

CHARLES ANISON ROGERS, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

---

On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court

Franklin County, Texas

Trial Court No. F7887

---

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Charles Anison Rogers, Jr., appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(c) (Vernon 2003). His sixty-year sentence was imposed March 23, 2006. Rogers timely filed a motion for new trial April 21, 2006.

            According to Rule 26.2, after Rogers timely filed his motion for new trial, he had ninety days after the date sentence was imposed to file a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). Rogers had until June 21, 2006, to file a notice of appeal. He did not, however, file his notice of appeal until June 28, 2006. No motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Hence, this appeal is untimely, and we are without jurisdiction to hear this case.

            We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                                                Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                                Chief Justice

Date Submitted:          July 31, 2006

Date Decided:             August 1, 2006

Do Not Publish