Jeremy Michael Norton v. State ( 2003 )


Menu:
















  • In The

    Court of Appeals

    Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



    ______________________________


    No. 06-03-00006-CR

    ______________________________




    JEREMY MICHAEL NORTON, Appellant


    V.


    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





    On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

    Gregg County, Texas

    Trial Court No. 28435-B









    Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross


    MEMORANDUM OPINION


    Jeremy Michael Norton has filed a motion asking to withdraw his notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.2, his motion is granted.

    The appeal is dismissed.



    Donald R. Ross

    Justice



    Date Submitted: August 4, 2003

    Date Decided: August 5, 2003



    Do Not Publish

    5;-"/>

      

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                                             In The

                                                    Court of Appeals

                            Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

     

                                                    ______________________________

     

                                                                 No. 06-09-00241-CR

                                                    ______________________________

     

     

                             QUINCY WELLINGTON JACKSON, Appellant

     

                                                                    V.

     

                                         THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

     

     

     

                                           On Appeal from the 188th Judicial District Court

                                                                 Gregg County, Texas

                                                              Trial Court No. 37052-A

     

                                              

     

     

     

                                              Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


                                                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

                Quincy Wellington Jackson filed a notice of appeal December 16, 2009, “on errors raised by written motion and ruled on before trial and on errors arising during and subsequent to trial.”  After a thorough review of the clerk’s record, we found no appealable order in the record.[1]

                A timely notice of appeal from a conviction or an appealable order is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  This Court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law.  Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.).

                After our receipt of the clerk’s record March 29, we notified counsel by letter March 30 of the possible jurisdictional defect and requested that counsel, within ten days of the date of the letter, show this Court how it had jurisdiction.  Counsel filed a motion requesting that this appeal be abated to the trial court “for entry of an order correcting the record to show that hearings [in a companion case] were also hearings in the other case.”   

     

     

     

     

     

     

                That motion is overruled.  There being no appealable order in the record, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

     

     

                                                                                        Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                        Chief Justice

     

    Date Submitted:          April 15, 2010

    Date Decided:             April 16, 2010

     

    Do Not Publish          

     

     

     

     

     

     

     



    [1]We note that the same competency hearing was involved both in this case and the companion, but while the other case proceeded to judgment, there is nothing to reflect that this prosecution did likewise.

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-03-00006-CR

Filed Date: 8/5/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015