Rafael Villard v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •              In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-19-00290-CR
    No. 02-19-00291-CR
    ___________________________
    RAFAEL VILLARD, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 3
    Tarrant County, Texas
    Trial Court Nos. 1454393D, 1474527D
    Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Rafael Villard attempts to appeal from (1) the trial court’s judgment
    adjudicating him guilty of assault of a family member by impeding the breathing or
    circulation of the victim, with a previous family-violence conviction, and (2) the trial
    court’s judgment convicting him of assault of a family or household member, with a
    previous family-violence conviction. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(b)(2)(A), (b-3).
    On February 10, 2017, the trial court sentenced Villard to three years’ confinement in
    each case with the sentences to run concurrently. Because Villard did not move for a
    new trial in either case, his notice of appeal in each case was due no later than March
    13, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 26.2(a)(1). Over two years later, on July 25, 2019,
    Villard filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal from both judgments.
    On August 1, 2019, we notified Villard by letter of our concern that we lacked
    jurisdiction over these appeals because the notice of appeal was untimely filed. See
    Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). We advised him that unless we received a response by
    August 12, 2019, showing grounds for continuing the appeals, the appeals could be
    dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. We have received no
    response.
    Our appellate jurisdiction is triggered through a timely filed notice of appeal.
    See Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If a notice of appeal is
    not timely filed under rule 26.2, we do not have jurisdiction to address the merits of
    the appeal and may take no action other than to dismiss it. See Slaton v. State,
    2
    
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Because Villard’s notice of appeal was
    untimely filed, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.
    26.2(a)(1), 43.2(f).
    /s/ Elizabeth Kerr
    Elizabeth Kerr
    Justice
    Do Not Publish
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    Delivered: September 26, 2019
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-19-00291-CR

Filed Date: 9/26/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/28/2019