Victor L. Jackson v. State of Texas ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                                   NO. 07-00-0439-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL A
    MAY 8, 2001
    ______________________________
    VICTOR L. JACKSON, APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 338TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;
    NO. 838752; HONORABLE ELSA ALCALA, JUDGE
    _______________________________
    Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
    ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
    Appellant Victor L. Jackson pled guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery and,
    on July 31, 2000, was sentenced to ten years confinement in the Institutional Division of
    the Department of Criminal Justice. He gave timely notice of appeal from his conviction.
    Appellant’s appointed counsel has now filed an Anders brief in support of a motion
    to withdraw in which she states that, after reviewing the entire appellate record, she is
    convinced no reversible error exists and the appeal is without merit. Anders v. California,
    
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744-45, 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    , 
    18 L. Ed. 2d 493
    (1967). Counsel has provided
    appellant with a copy of the brief and informed him that he has a right to review the record
    and file a pro se brief if he so desires. Appellant has indicated to this court that he desires
    to file a brief and was given until April 30, 2001, to do so. Appellant has now filed a motion
    for extension of time indicating that the court clerk has refused to furnish him with a copy
    of the record and he cannot file a brief without that record. He has also attached a copy
    of a notification from the Harris County District Clerk that his request to obtain the record
    was denied.
    It is the duty of the trial court to provide an indigent defendant with an adequate
    record on appeal. Newman v. State, 
    937 S.W.2d 1
    , 3 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996); Snoke v.
    State, 
    780 S.W.2d 210
    , 212 (Tex.Crim.App. 1989). Given that appellant has expressed
    his desire to file a pro se brief but asserts that he has been unable to obtain a copy of the
    record, we believe a hearing should be held as provided in Texas Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 38.8(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is abated and the cause remanded to the
    338th District Court of Harris County.
    Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given
    and to conduct a hearing to determine what steps need to be taken to facilitate and ensure
    2
    the provision of an appellate record to appellant. The court should also determine if any
    other orders are necessary to ensure the proper and timely pursuit of appellant’s appeal.
    In support of its determinations, the trial court shall prepare and file written findings
    of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s
    record. The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental
    reporter’s record. The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records shall be submitted to
    the clerk of this court no later than June 8, 2001.
    It is so ordered.
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-00-00439-CR

Filed Date: 5/8/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015