Jay Cohen v. Tour Partners, LTD., Dennis J. Wilkerson, and Eighteen Investments, Inc. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                           ACCEPTED
    01-15-00705-CV
    FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    12/8/2015 2:09:36 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    No. 01-15-00705-CV
    In the Court of Appeals                    FILED IN
    1st COURT OF APPEALS
    For the First Judicial District of Texas       HOUSTON, TEXAS
    Houston, Texas                 12/8/2015 2:09:36 PM
    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    Clerk
    Jay H. Cohen,
    Appellant
    v.
    Tour Partners, Ltd.; Dennis J. Wilkerson; and Eighteen Investments, Inc.,
    Appellees
    On Appeal from Cause No. 2013-68181
    In The 55th District Court of Harris County, Texas
    The Honorable Judge Shadwick, Presiding
    Appellees’ Response to Appellant’s Motion for Extension
    Hawash Meade Gaston
    Neese & Cicack LLP
    Walter J. Cicack
    Texas Bar No. 04250535
    Samuel B. Haren
    Texas Bar No. 24059899
    2118 Smith Street
    Houston, Texas 77002
    713-658-9001 (phone)
    713-658-9011 (fax)
    wcicack@hmgnc.com
    sharen@hmgnc.com
    Attorneys for Appellees
    and Cross Appellant
    Appellant Jay H. Cohen’s opening brief was due on November 13, 2015. He
    did not file one until December 8, 2015. His excuses for his tardiness are vague and
    self-contradictory, and the Court should not permit him to file his late brief.
    Background
    Cohen and Cross-Appellee Tour Partners, Ltd. (“Tour Partners”) were
    involved in related lawsuits before the 55th and 269th District Courts of Harris
    County, Texas (the “55th Case” and “269th Case,” respectively). The 55th Case led
    to the instant appeal. Cohen’s appeal of the 269th Case was docketed in the
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals as Cause Number 14-15-00392-CV. Cohen requested
    and received three extensions of his briefing deadline, but he never filed his opening
    brief—or even a fourth request for extension—in that appeal. See Exhibit 1, 14th
    Court Motion to Dismiss (detailing Cohen’s history of extensions). The Fourteenth
    Court dismissed Cohen’s appeal of the 269th Case on November 10, 2015. See
    Exhibit 2, 14th Court Memorandum Opinion.
    Cohen’s opening brief was due in the instant appeal on November 13, 2015.
    Cohen did not meet that deadline. Tour Partners filed a Motion to Dismiss on
    November 23, 2015, which is incorporated herein. On November 24, 2015, the Court
    issued a Notice of Late Brief which warned Cohen that his appeal could be dismissed
    unless he filed a brief and motion for extension by December 4, 2015. That notice
    further stated that an untimely brief would only be accepted if Cohen could
    “reasonably explain [his] failure to timely file [his] brief” and if Tour Partners “is
    not significantly injured” by Cohen’s failure to comply with his briefing deadline.
    Cohen missed that deadline as well.
    On December 8, 2015, Cohen filed his brief and motion for extension (the
    “Motion”). But his Motion does not offer a reasonable explanation for his failure to
    meet his briefing deadline.
    Discussion
    I.    Cohen’s explanations for his untimely brief are vague and contradictory.
    According to Cohen, he should be excused from his briefing deadline because
    (1) he was too sick to file a timely motion for extension and (2) he has been too busy
    to timely file a motion for extension. That is, Cohen says he was unable to draft a
    two-page motion for extension despite having the time and ability to try a case,
    prepare for three other trials, attend two mediations, participate in a tax protest
    hearing, prepare for and conduct an involved shareholder meeting, respond to
    discovery, and perform “[v]arious other time-sensitive matters for clients.” See
    Motion at 3–4. Apparently, filing a motion to extend a briefing deadline in this Court
    was not one of those a “time-sensitive matters” Cohen’s attorney—or his partner—
    chose to perform.
    Cohen’s Motion does not list all of the relevant “other matters” on which his
    attorney worked. For example, Cohen’s counsel was not so ill as to prevent him from
    2
    filing a motion to extend in his case against Tour Partners in the Fourteenth Court
    on September 9, 2015, nor was he too busy to file a new lawsuit on behalf of Cohen
    on October 22, 2015. See Exhibit 3, Third Motion for Extension; Exhibit 4, Cohen’s
    District Court Petition. Moreover, Cohen’s attorney further fails to explain how his
    illness and family matters prevented him from filing a timely motion for extension
    or contacting Tour Partners regarding his predicament but did not prevent him from
    completing the tasks described in his Motion as well as the “[v]arious other time-
    sensitive matters for clients.” In short, Cohen has failed to provide a “reasonable
    explanation” for his delay.
    II.    Tour Partners would be injured if Court accepts Cohen’s untimely brief.
    Tour Partners has filed a cross appeal in this case.1 That appeal would provide
    an alternative basis to uphold the trial court’s ruling in the event Cohen would
    otherwise succeed in the instant appeal. If Cohen does not succeed in his appeal,
    Tour Partner’s cross appeal will be moot. Because Cohen’s other appeal was
    dismissed by the Fourteenth Court, Tour Partners asked Cohen on November 16,
    2015 whether he intended to file a brief in this appeal. See Exhibit 8,
    1
    Tour Partners won both the 55th and 269th Cases on summary judgment. See Exhibit 5, 269th
    Summary Judgment Order; Exhibit 6, 55th First Summary Judgment Order. After the 269th Court
    issued a final judgment, Tour Partners filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment in the
    55th Case based on res judicata. Because Tour Partners had already defeated Cohen’s claims, the
    55th Court denied that supplemental motion as moot. See Exhibit 7, 55th Second Summary
    Judgment Order.
    3
    Correspondence. Cohen did not respond to that email, nor did he (1) explain his
    difficulties in filing a brief nor (2) ask Tour Partners to agree to an extension.2 Had
    he done so in a timely manner, Tour Partners would have certainly considered
    agreeing to an extension based on the health of Cohen’s attorney. Tour Partners
    agreed to Cohen’s first request for an extension in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals,
    demonstrating its reasonableness in these matters. See Exhibit 9, Cohen’s First
    Motion for Extension.
    Due to the Fourteenth Court’s dismissal of Cohen’s other appeal and Cohen’s
    lack of any indication that he intended to file a brief or seek an extension in this
    appeal, Tour Partners correctly surmised that Cohen did not intend to file a timely
    brief in this case. As a result, Tour Partners did not undertake the time and expense
    of drafting an unnecessary brief. If Cohen is allowed to file his untimely brief, Tour
    Partners will not be able to present its cross appeal unless the Court grants it leave
    to do so.
    Conclusion
    Cohen did not file his brief or Motion until well after the deadline. As detailed
    in Tour Partners’ previously-filed Motion to Dismiss, Cohen is a serial-offender in
    this regard. Cohen has not provided a cogent or reasonable explanation for his
    2
    Cohen’s certificate of conference notwithstanding, he has not communicated with Tour Partners
    at all regarding his briefing in this case, let alone conferred on his request for an extension of his
    briefing deadline.
    4
    failure, and allowing Cohen to file an untimely brief would harm Tour Partners. Tour
    Partners prays that the Court dismiss Cohen’s appeal, issue a final judgment, and
    grant Tour Partners all other relief to which it is entitled.
    In the event the Court accepts Cohen’s untimely brief, Tour Partners asks for
    fourteen (14) days to file its opening brief on its cross appeal.
    Respectfully submitted,
    Hawash Meade Gaston
    Neese & Cicack LLP
    /s/ Walter J. Cicack
    Walter J. Cicack
    Texas Bar No. 04250535
    Samuel B. Haren
    Texas Bar No. 24059899
    2118 Smith Street
    Houston, Texas 77002
    713-658-9001 (phone)
    713-658-9011 (fax)
    wcicack@hmgnc.com
    sharen@hmgnc.com
    Attorneys for Appellees and
    Cross-Appellant
    5
    Certificate of Service
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on
    the following via Electronic Service, on December 8, 2015:
    George F. May
    Twomey | May, PLLC
    2 Riverway, 15th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77056
    george@twomeymay.com
    Attorney for Appellant
    Jay H. Cohen
    /s/ Samuel B. Haren
    Samuel B. Haren
    6
    ACCEPTED
    14-15-00392-CV
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    10/19/2015 2:51:00 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    No. 14-15-00392-CV
    In the Court of Appeals
    For the Fourteenth Judicial District of Texas
    Houston, Texas
    Jay H. Cohen,
    Appellant
    v.
    Tour Partners, Ltd.,
    Appellee
    On Appeal from Cause No. 2013-41051
    In The 269th District Court of Harris County, Texas
    The Honorable Judge Hinde, Presiding
    Tour Partners’ Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution
    Hawash Meade Gaston
    Neese & Cicack LLP
    Walter J. Cicack
    Texas Bar No. 04250535
    Samuel B. Haren
    Texas Bar No. 24032854
    2118 Smith Street
    Houston, Texas 77002
    713-658-9001 (phone)
    713-658-9011 (fax)
    wcicack@hmgnc.com
    sharen@hmgnc.com
    Attorneys for Appellee
    Tour Partners, Ltd.
    Exhibit 1
    Appellant Jay H. Cohen (“Cohen”) has received three extensions of his
    briefing deadline. Despite these extensions, Cohen still has not filed his brief. As
    demonstrated below, the Court should dismiss Cohen’s appeal for want of
    prosecution.
    Background
    The initial clerk’s record was filed on June 10. Cohen’s opening brief was
    initially due on July 10. Cohen has requested three extensions of his briefing
    deadline:
     First Extension: Two days before his initial deadline, Cohen sought a
    thirty-one day extension based on his attorney’s busy schedule. Appellee
    Tour Partners, Ltd. (“Tour Partners”) did not oppose this request. The
    Court granted the thirty-one day extension.
     Second Extension: The day of the second deadline, Cohen sought a thirty-
    day extension based on his dissatisfaction with the contents of the Clerk’s
    Record. Tour Partners did not oppose this request. The Court granted the
    thirty-day extension.
     Third Extension: The day of the third deadline, Cohen sought another
    extension based on his dissatisfaction with the Contents of the Clerk’s
    Record. Because Cohen’s own inattention to the file caused the lateness of
    the Clerk’s Record, Tour Partners opposed this request. The Court
    (1) granted a thirty-six day extension and (2) warned that “no further
    extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances . . . .”
    Order Granting Third Motion to Extend (emphasis in original).
    Cohen’s final deadline to file his brief was Thursday, October 15. As of the
    afternoon of Monday, October 19, Cohen still has not filed his brief.
    Discussion
    “If an appellant fails to timely file a brief,” Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
    38.8(a)(1) allows the Court to “dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless
    the appellant reasonably explains the failure . . . .” Despite three extensions, Cohen
    has failed to timely file a brief.
    According to Cohen, this failure was caused by Cohen’s confusion over the
    contents of his own record:
    In reviewing the brief as drafted last week, I realized that it had been
    drafted assuming that no summary judgment evidence was excluded.
    The order granting in part some of your objections had not made it into
    the record. I immediately emailed Sam [Haren, attorney for Tour
    Partners,] and you to ask permission to include the order as a tab to the
    brief, which Sam indicated was not opposed.1 To not mislead the Court,
    I then attempted to re-draft the brief to ensure that there was no error as
    to the summary judgment evidence admitted, and I also had to address
    the exclusions. The re-write was too significant (as you can imagine) to
    complete in time. I have redrafted the brief and will be filing it
    tomorrow with a motion to extend time to the filing date. Unless you
    tell me otherwise, I will assume you are opposed to the extension.
    Exhibit 1, Email from May to Cicack at 1 (emphasis added). That is, Cohen failed
    to meet his fourth briefing deadline because he once again did not thoroughly
    examine the Clerk’s Record until the evening his brief was due.2
    1
    The request referenced by Cohen was sent at 5:24 p.m. on the October 15 briefing deadline. See
    Exhibit 1, Email from May to Cicack at 2. Tour Partners’ counsel agreed to this request. 
    Id. 2 In
    assessing this inattention, the Court should note that Cohen’s current appellate counsel also
    represented him at the time of the evidentiary ruling in question.
    2
    Prayer
    Cohen has had three chances to file his brief on time. Tour Partners
    respectfully submits that the Court should not indulge Cohen’s continued lack of
    diligence by granting him a strike four. Tour Partners prays that the Court dismiss
    Cohen’s appeal for want of prosecution and grant Tour Partners all other relief to
    which it is entitled.
    Respectfully submitted,
    Hawash Meade Gaston
    Neese & Cicack LLP
    /s/ Walter J. Cicack
    Walter J. Cicack
    Texas Bar No. 04250535
    Samuel B. Haren
    Texas Bar No. 24032854
    2118 Smith Street
    Houston, Texas 77002
    713-658-9001 (phone)
    713-658-9011 (fax)
    wcicack@hmgnc.com
    sharen@hmgnc.com
    Attorneys for Appellee
    Tour Partners, Ltd.
    3
    Certificate of Conference
    I hereby certify that I have conferred with opposing counsel concerning the
    relief requested herein. Opposing counsel is opposed.
    /s/ Samuel B. Haren
    Samuel B. Haren
    Certificate of Service
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on
    the following via Electronic Service, on October 19, 2015:
    George F. May
    Twomey | May, PLLC
    2 Riverway, 15th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77056
    george@twomeymay.com
    Attorney for Appellant
    Jay H. Cohen
    /s/ Samuel B. Haren
    Samuel B. Haren
    4
    From:                        George May 
    Sent:                        Monday, October 19, 2015 12:32 PM
    To:                          Walter Cicack; Sam Haren
    Subject:                     RE: Cohen v. Preston, Tour Partners
    Walter,
    I am preparing for a shareholders' meeting for a corporate client today.
    In reviewing the brief as drafted last week, I realized that it had been drafted assuming that no summary judgment
    evidence was excluded. The order granting in part some of your objections had not made it into the record. I immediately
    emailed Sam and you to ask permission to include the order as a tab to the brief, which Sam indicated was not opposed.
    To not mislead the Court, I then attempted to re-draft the brief to ensure that there was no error as to the summary
    judgment evidence admitted, and I also had to address the exclusions. The re-write was too significant (as you can
    imagine) to complete in time. I have redrafted the brief and will be filing it tomorrow with a motion to extend time to the
    filing date. Unless you tell me otherwise, I will assume you are opposed to the extension.
    Should you wish to file a motion to dismiss, which I of course would oppose, please note the above for the Court. I am
    tied up today but available in the morning tomorrow if you wish to talk.
    George F. May, BS, JD
    Twomey | May, PLLC
    2 Riverway, 15th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77056
    (713) 659-0000
    (832) 201-8485 – Facsimile
    george@twomeymay.com
    NOTICE: This transmission may be: (1) subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege, (2) an attorney work product, or (3)
    strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate
    this information. If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message.
    Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. This communication does not reflect an
    intention by the sender or the sender's client or principal to conduct a transaction or make any agreement by electronic
    means. Nothing contained in this message or in any attachment shall satisfy the requirements for a writing, and nothing
    contained herein shall constitute a contract or electronic signature under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National
    Commerce Act, any version of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or any other statute governing electronic
    transactions.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Walter Cicack [mailto:wcicack@hmgnc.com]
    Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 11:59 AM
    To: George May; Sam Haren
    Subject: RE: Cohen v. Preston, Tour Partners
    George, I just left you a message. I just want to make sure we did not miss something. If you filed something in the appeal
    of the Cohen case I did not get it. Assuming you did not file something, we will file a motion to dismiss and I wanted to see
    if you opposed. Please get back to me. Thanks
    Walter Cicack
    (713) 658-9003 (direct)
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Walter Cicack
    Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 4:35 PM
    To: 'George May' ; Sam Haren 
    1
    Exhibit 1
    Subject: RE: Cohen v. Preston, Tour Partners
    George, did you file something? We did not receive anything.
    Walter Cicack
    (713) 658-9003 (direct)
    -----Original Message-----
    From: George May [mailto:george@twomeymay.com]
    Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:24 PM
    To: Sam Haren ; Walter Cicack 
    Subject: Cohen v. Preston, Tour Partners
    Sam and/or Walter,
    Judge Hinde's order on your summary judgment objections did not make it into the record somehow. May I include a copy
    as a tab with the appendix?
    George May
    Twomey May, PLLC
    Two Riverway, 15th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77056
    (713) 659-0000
    (281) 201-8485 - fax
    george@twomeymay.com
    2
    Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed
    November 10, 2015.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-15-00392-CV
    JAY COHEN, Appellant
    V.
    TOURS PARTNERS, LTD. AND PRESTON REALTY CORPORATION,
    Appellee
    On Appeal from the 269th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2013-41051
    MEMORANDUM                      OPINION
    This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 28, 2015. The clerk’s
    record was filed June 10, 2015. No reporter’s record was taken. Appellant’s brief
    was due October 15, 2015. No brief was filed.
    On October 29, 2015, appellee filed a motion to dismiss for want of
    prosecution. See Tex. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant filed no response. Accordingly,
    Exhibit 2
    appellee’s motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown.
    2
    ACCEPTED
    14-15-00392-CV
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    9/9/2015 5:51:38 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    NO: 14-15-00392-CV
    IN THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
    AT HOUSTON, TEXAS
    JAY H. COHEN,
    Appellant
    v.
    TOUR PARTNERS, LTD,
    Appellee
    From the 269th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2013-41051
    APPELLANT’S THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
    FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF TO ALLOW TIME FOR
    SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD TO BE FILED
    TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, Appellant Jay H.
    Cohen files this Motion for Extension of Time to File his Appellant’s Brief,
    which motion complies with Rule 10.5(b), and in support thereof would
    respectfully show as follows:
    1.       This is an appeal from a final judgment in Cause No. 2013-41051;
    Jay H. Cohen v. Tour Partners, Ltd. and Preston Realty Corporation; in the
    269th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas.
    2.       This is Appellant’s third request for an extension of time.
    Exhibit 3
    Appellant’s first unopposed request was granted on July 9, 2015 and his second
    unopposed request was granted on August 13, 2015.
    3.   The original clerk’s record was incomplete. The clerk’s record
    filed failed to contain all of the summary judgment pleadings upon which the
    trial court ruled and a supplemental record was requested on July 29, 2015.
    4.   Appellant also filed an Unopposed Motion with the Court of
    Appeals to permit the filing of the Supplemental Clerk’s Record. The Court of
    Appeals granted Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Supplement the Clerk’s
    Record on August 13, 2015.
    5.   Appellee’s counsel has stated that Appellee opposes this request
    for an extension to allow time for the requested Supplemental Clerk’s Record to
    be filed.
    6.   The Supplemental Clerk’s Record has not been prepared or filed.
    Attached as Exhibit 1 hereto is Appellant’s counsel’s correspondence of even
    date to the Harris County District Clerk requesting that the Supplemental
    Clerk’s Record be RUSHED.
    7.   The extended deadline for Appellant to file his initial brief is
    today, September 9, 2015.
    8.   Because the Supplemental Clerk’s Record has yet to be filed,
    Appellant is unable to properly or adequately prepare Appellant’s brief and is
    2
    requesting an extension of time until the earlier of 14-days after the
    Supplemental Clerk’s Record is filed or October 15, 2015.
    9.     Mr. Cohen does not seek this extension for the purposes of delay.
    Appellant seeks this extension in the interest of justice; specifically to permit
    the incomplete record to be supplemented pursuant to the pending request to the
    trial court clerk.
    PRAYER
    For all these reasons, Appellant Jay H. Cohen respectfully requests a 30-
    day extension of time for filing his Appellant’s Brief from today, September 9,
    2015 until the earlier of 14-days after the Supplemental Clerk’s Record is filed
    with the Court of Appeals or October 15, 2015. Mr. Cohen also seeks all such
    other or further relief to which he may be justly entitled.
    TWOMEY | MAY, PLLC
    /s/ George F. May/
    _______________________________
    George F. May
    TBA No. 24037050
    2 Riverway, 15th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77056
    (713) 659-0000 [Telephone]
    (832) 201-8485 [Telecopier]
    george@twomeymay.com
    Counsel for Appellant, Jay H. Cohen
    3
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    I certify that on September 9, 2015, I conferred with Sam Haren, co-counsel for
    Appellee, via email and counsel stated that Appellee is opposed to this motion.
    /s/ George F. May/
    _______________________________
    George F. May
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.3 and 9.5(b), (d), (e), I
    certify that I have served this document on counsel for Appellee as listed below
    on September 9, 2015 as follows:
    Walter J. Cicack
    wcicack@hmgnc.com
    HAWASH MEAD GASTON NEESE & CICACK, LLP
    2118 Smith Street
    Houston, Texas 77002
    Telephone: (713) 658-9001
    Facsimile: (713) 658-9011
    Attorneys for Appellee Tour Partners, Ltd.
    By (check all that apply)
    personal delivery
    mail
    commercial delivery service
    X       fax, email, or electronic service
    /s/ George F. May/
    George F. May
    Date: September 9, 2015
    4
    TWOMEY | MAY, P.L.L.C.                                                      TWOMEY | MAY, P.L.L.C.
    Attorneys at Law                                         2 Riverway, 15th Floor
    George F. May                 Houston, Texas 77056
    george@twomeymay.com    (713) 659-0000 – Telephone
    (832) 201-8485 – Telecopier
    August 9, 2015
    Mr. Chris Daniel                                       Via E-File and Hand Delivery
    District Clerk, Civil Division
    Attn: Ms. Phyllis Washington, Deputy
    Post Judgment
    P.O. Box 4651
    Houston, Texas 77210
    RE:    Request to Rush Supplemental Clerk’s Record in Appellate Case No. 14-15-00392-CV;
    Jay Cohen v. Tour Partners, Ltd. and Preston Realty Corporation; In the Fourteenth
    Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas- Trial Court No. 2012-41051
    Dear Ms. Washington:
    On July 29, 2015, a request to supplement the clerk’s record in the above referenced case was
    filed by Appellant Jay Cohen. The request is attached as Exhibit A.
    On August 13, 2015, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals granted Mr. Cohen’s motion to
    supplement the Clerk’s Record. Notice of the Court of Appeal’s Order is attached as Exhibit B.
    The deadline for Mr. Cohen’s Appellant’s brief was set to be today, September 9, 2015. The
    supplemental record has not been prepared or filed and Mr. Cohen is requesting that the
    preparation and filing of the supplemental clerk’s record be RUSHED and fulfilled on the earliest
    possible date.
    Please contact me when your office has calculated the estimated cost of the supplemental record
    and we will hand-deliver payment the same day.
    Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this urgent matter. Please contact me if you
    have any questions.
    Very truly yours,
    /s/ George F. May/
    George F. May
    Counsel for Appellant Jay Cohen
    Cc:    Walter Cicack (via e-mail to wcicack@hmgnc.com)
    Sam Haren (via e-mail to sharen@hmgnc.com)
    EXHIBIT A
    7/29/2015 4:30:28 PM
    Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County
    Envelope No. 6281005
    By: Duane Gilmore
    Filed: 7/29/2015 4:30:28 PM
    NO. 2013-41051
    JAY COHEN,                                     §               IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
    Plaintiff                                 §
    §
    v.                                             §               HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
    §
    TOUR PARTNERS, LTD., and                       §
    PRESTON REALTY CORPORATION,                    §
    k
    Defendants                                §               269th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    ler
    tC
    REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK’S RECORD
    ric
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
    ist
    COMES NOW Plaintiff Jay Cohen pursuant to Rule 34.5 of the Texas Rule of Appellate
    lD
    nie
    Procedure to respectfully request that the clerk prepare a supplement to the record in the appeal
    Da
    from the above numbered and styled case. The supplemental record should be certified and
    is
    delivered to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Appeal Case 14-15-00392-CV.
    hr
    C
    Mr. Cohen requests that the following be included in the supplemental record:
    of
    Image No. 65211494 Plaintiff Jay Cohens Notice of Appeal - filed on 04/28/2015; 2 pages
    e
    Image No. 64452951 Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial - filed on 02/27/2015; 8 pages
    ffic
    Image No. 64023492 ORDER SIGNED GRANTING ENTRY OF TEMPORARY ORDERS -
    filed on 01/28/2015; 5 pages
    yO
    Image No. 63171721 Plaintiff Jay Cohen's motion for default judgment against defendant Preston
    Realty Corporation - filed on 11/13/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63171722 Exhibit A - filed on 11/13/2014; 2 pages
    op
    Image No. 63171723 Exhibit B - filed on 11/13/2014; 2 pages
    C
    Image No. 63171724 Exhibit C - filed on 11/13/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 63171725 Exhibit C-1 - filed on 11/13/2014; 3 pages
    ial
    Image No. 63171726 Exhibit C-2 - filed on 11/13/2014; 4 pages
    fic
    Image No. 63093159 Tour Partner's motion to strike and special exceptions - filed on
    11/07/2014; 4 pages
    of
    Image No. 63171651 Proposed Order - filed on 11/13/2014; 1 page
    Un
    Image No. 63102481 Notice of submission - filed on 11/07/2014; 1 page
    Image No. 63084911 Tour Partner's reply in support of its traditional and no evidence motion for
    summary judgment and objections to Cohen's summary judgment evidence - filed on 11/06/2014;
    17 pages
    Image No. 63084913 Exhibit 20 - filed on 11/06/2014; 12 pages
    Image No. 63084914 Exhibit 21 - filed on 11/06/2014; 19 pages
    Image No. 63084915 Exhibit 22 - filed on 11/06/2014; 7 pages
    Image No. 63030179 Plaintiff's objection and response to defendant's traditional and No-
    evidence motion for summary judgment - filed on 11/03/2014; 27 pages
    Image No. 63030198 Ex. 16 - filed on 11/03/2014; 8 pages
    Image No. 63030180 Exhibit A - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63037684 Exhibit A - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages
    Image No. 63030181 Exhibit A-1 - filed on 11/03/2014; 15 pages
    Image No. 63030192 Exhibit A-10 - filed on 11/03/2014; 22 pages
    Image No. 63030193 Exhibit A-11 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 63030194 Exhibit A-12 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030195 Exhibit A-13 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030196 Exhibit A-14 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030197 Exhibit A-15 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    k
    ler
    Image No. 63030199 Exhibit A-16a - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 63030200 Exhibit A-17 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    tC
    Image No. 63030201 Exhibit A-18 - filed on 11/03/2014; 9 pages
    Image No. 63030202 Exhibit A-19 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    ric
    Image No. 63030182 Exhibit A-2 - filed on 11/03/2014; 15 pages
    Image No. 63030203 Exhibit A-20 - filed on 11/03/2014; 32 pages
    ist
    Image No. 63030204 Exhibit A-21 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    lD
    Image No. 63030205 Exhibit A-22 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030206 Exhibit A-23 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    nie
    Image No. 63030207 Exhibit A-24 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030208 Exhibit A-25 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Da
    Image No. 63030209 Exhibit A-26 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages
    Image No. 63030210 Exhibit A-27 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages
    is
    Image No. 63030211 Exhibit A-28 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    hr
    Image No. 63030183 Exhibit A-3 - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages
    Image No. 63037683 EXHIBIT A-4 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    C
    Image No. 63030185 Exhibit A-5 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages
    of
    e
    Image No. 63030186 Exhibit A-6 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030187 Exhibit A-7 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages
    ffic
    Image No. 63030188 Exhibit A-8 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages
    yO
    Image No. 63030189 Exhibit A-9 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 63030190 Exhibit A-9a - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages
    Image No. 63030191 Exhibit A-9b - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    op
    Image No. 63030212 Exhibit B - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages
    C
    Image No. 63030213 Exhibit B-1 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages
    Image No. 63030214 Exhibit B-2 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages
    ial
    Image No. 63030215 Exhibit C - filed on 11/03/2014; -145 pages
    fic
    Image No. 63093155 Proposed Order - filed on 11/07/2014; 2 pages
    Image No. 63030217 Plaintiff's objection and response to defendant's traditional and No-
    of
    evidence motion for summary judgment - filed on 11/03/2014; 27 pages
    Un
    Image No. 63030236 Exhibit 16 - filed on 11/03/2014; 8 pages
    Image No. 63030218 Exhibit A - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030219 Exhibit A-1 - filed on 11/03/2014; 15 pages
    Image No. 63030230 Exhibit A-10 - filed on 11/03/2014; 22 pages
    Image No. 63030231 Exhibit A-11 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 63030232 Exhibit A-12 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030233 Exhibit A-13 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030234 Exhibit A-14 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030235 Exhibit A-15 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 63030237 Exhibit A-16a - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    2
    Image No. 63030238 Exhibit A-17 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 63030239 Exhibit A-18 - filed on 11/03/2014; 9 pages
    Image No. 63030240 Exhibit A-19 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030220 Exhibit A-2 - filed on 11/03/2014; 15 pages
    Image No. 63030241 Exhibit A-20 - filed on 11/03/2014; 32 pages
    Image No. 63030242 Exhibit A-21 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030243 Exhibit A-22 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030244 Exhibit A-23 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030245 Exhibit A-24 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030246 Exhibit A-25 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    k
    ler
    Image No. 63030247 Exhibit A-26 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages
    Image No. 63030248 Exhibit A-27 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages
    tC
    Image No. 63030249 Exhibit A-28 - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030221 Exhibit A-3 - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages
    ric
    Image No. 63030222 Exhibit A-4 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 63030223 Exhibit A-5 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages
    ist
    Image No. 63030224 Exhibit A-6 - filed on 11/03/2014; 5 pages
    lD
    Image No. 63030225 Exhibit A-7 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages
    Image No. 63030226 Exhibit A-8 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages
    nie
    Image No. 63030227 Exhibit A-9 - filed on 11/03/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 63030228 Exhibit A-9a - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages
    Da
    Image No. 63030229 Exhibit A-9b - filed on 11/03/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 63030250 Exhibit B - filed on 11/03/2014; 2 pages
    is
    Image No. 63030251 Exhibit B-1 - filed on 11/03/2014; 4 pages
    hr
    Image No. 63030252 Exhibit B-2 - filed on 11/03/2014; 7 pages
    Image No. 63030253 Exhibit C - filed on 11/03/2014; 145 pages
    C
    Image No. 62928870 Tour Partners Response to Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Substitute
    of
    Counsel - filed on 10/27/2014; 2 pages
    e
    Image No. 62861852 Plaintiff Jay Cohen's unopposed Motion to Substitute counsel - filed on
    10/22/2014; 4 pages
    ffic
    Image No. 62861853 proposed order granting motion to substitute counsel - filed on 10/22/2014;
    yO
    2 pages
    Image No. 62821118 Tour Partners' Traditional and No-Evidence Motion for Summary
    Judgment - filed on 10/17/2014; 36 pages
    op
    Image No. 62821121 Exhibit 1 - filed on 10/17/2014; 76 pages
    C
    Image No. 62821130 Exhibit 10 - filed on 10/17/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 62821131 Exhibit 11 - filed on 10/17/2014; 3 pages
    ial
    Image No. 62821132 Exhibit 12 - filed on 10/17/2014; 4 pages
    fic
    Image No. 62821133 Exhibit 13 - filed on 10/17/2014; 4 pages
    Image No. 62821134 Exhibit 14 - filed on 10/17/2014; 4 pages
    of
    Image No. 62821135 Exhibit 15 - filed on 10/17/2014; 7 pages
    Un
    Image No. 62821136 Exhibit 16 - filed on 10/17/2014; 15 pages
    Image No. 62821137 Exhibit 17 - filed on 10/17/2014; 8 pages
    Image No. 62821138 Exhibit 18 - filed on 10/17/2014; 9 pages
    Image No. 62821139 Exhibit 19 - filed on 10/17/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 62821122 Exhibit 2 - filed on 10/17/2014; 5 pages
    Image No. 62821123 Exhibit 3 - filed on 10/17/2014; 3 pages
    Image No. 62821124 Exhibit 4 - filed on 10/17/2014; 19 pages
    Image No. 62821125 Exhibit 5 - filed on 10/17/2014; 12 pages
    Image No. 62821126 Exhibit 6 - filed on 10/17/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 62821127 Exhibit 7 - filed on 10/17/2014; 45 pages
    3
    Image No. 62821128 Exhibit 8 - filed on 10/17/2014; 2 pages
    Image No. 62821129 Exhibit 9 - filed on 10/17/2014; 4 pages
    Image No. 62663391 Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel - filed on 10/07/2014; 2 pages
    Image No. 62663392 Docket Control Order - filed on 10/07/2014; 1 pages
    Image No. 62690110 Exhibit 03 - filed on 10/09/2014; 2 pages
    Image No. 62305356 ORDER SIGNED GRANTING ENTRY OF TEMPORARY
    ORDERS - filed on 08/25/2014; 1 pages
    Image No. 61683924 Discovery Control Plan - filed on 07/23/2014; 1 pages
    Image No. 61512462 Plaintiffs Ellington F Holdings LLC's and R. David Denenberg's
    Objections and Response in Opposition to Defendant Tour Partners, Ltd.'s Motion to Consolidate
    k
    ler
    - filed on 07/10/2014; 7 pages
    Image No. 61519437 Supplement to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant, Tour Partners, Ltd.'s,
    tC
    Motion for Judicial Review of Documentation or Instrument Purporting to Create a Lien, Claim
    or Interest in Real Property - filed on 07/10/2014; 3 pages
    ric
    Image No. 61519438 Plaintiffs Ellington F Holdings LLC's and R. David Denenburg's Amended
    Objections and Response in Opposition to defendant Tour Partners, Ltd.'s Motion to Consolidate
    ist
    - filed on 07/10/2014; 7 pages
    lD
    Image No. 61519439 Exhibit 1 - filed on 07/10/2014; 61 pages
    Image No. 61519440 Exhibit 2 - filed on 07/10/2014; 7 pages
    nie
    Image No. 61519441 Exhibit 3 - filed on 07/10/2014; 15 pages
    Image No. 61519442 Proposed Order - filed on 07/10/2014; 1 pages
    Da
    Image No. 61528236 Plaintiff's response to defendant, Tour Partners, LTD's motion for judicial
    review of documentation or instrument purporting to create a lien, claim or interest in real
    is
    property - filed on 07/10/2014; 8 pages
    hr
    Image No. 61528242 Exhibit A - filed on 07/10/2014; 6 pages
    Image No. 61528243 Exhibit B - filed on 07/10/2014; 9 pages
    C
    Image No. 61528244 Exhibit C - filed on 07/10/2014; 5 pages
    of
    Image No. 61528245 Proposed order - filed on 07/10/2014; 1 pages
    e
    Image No. 61528501 Plaintiff's response to defendant, Tour Partners, LTD's motion to
    consolidate - filed on 07/10/2014; 2 pages
    ffic
    Image No. 61528504 Proposed order - filed on 07/10/2014; 1 pages
    yO
    Image No. 60738990 Defendant Tour Partners, ltd.'s motion to consolidate - filed on 05/09/2014;
    3 pages
    Image No. 60738991 Exhibit 1 - filed on 05/09/2014; 1 pages
    op
    Image No. 60738992 Proposed order - filed on 05/09/2014; 2 pages
    C
    Image No. 60741538 Defendant Tour Partners motion for judicial review of documentation or
    instrument purporting to create a lien, claim, or interest in real property - filed on 05/09/2014; 6
    ial
    pages
    fic
    Image No. 60741541 Exhibit 1, Subordination of Lien - filed on 05/09/2014; 4 pages
    Image No. 60741543 Proposed order - filed on 05/09/2014; 2 pages
    of
    Image No. 60745044 Exhibit a to Defendants Second amended answer and original counterclaim
    Un
    - filed on 05/09/2014; 4 pages
    Image No. 58939261 Defendants withdrawal of defendants amended motion to dismiss directed
    to plaintiffs first amended petition - filed on 12/24/2013 2 pages
    Image No. 58636392 Plaintiff's second amended petition - filed on 12/06/2013 8 pages
    Image No. 58636433 Plaintiff's second amended petition - filed on 12/06/2013 8 pages
    Image No. 586Image No. 62602 Plaintiff's Response to Tour Partners, Ltd.'s Amended Motion
    to Dismiss - filed on 12/06/2013 9 pages
    Image No. 58388466 Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss Directed to Plaintiff's
    First Amended Petition - filed on 11/21/2013 6 pages
    Image No. 57990831 Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss - filed on 10/25/2013
    4
    4 pages
    Image No. 58052445 Plaintiff's First Amended Petition - filed on 10/25/2013 7 pages
    Image No. 58052446 Exhibit E - filed on 10/25/2013 3 pages
    Image No. 57672083 Defendants Motion to Dismiss - filed on 10/07/2013 9 pages
    Image No. 57672084 Original Answer Subject to Motion to Dismiss - filed on 10/07/2013 4
    pages
    Please expedite this request as the appeal is currently pending. Mr. Cohen will pre-pay
    k
    ler
    the estimated cost of the supplemental record immediately.
    tC
    :                                     Respectfully submitted,
    ric
    TWOMEY | MAY, PLLC
    ist
    lD
    /s/ George F. May/
    _______________________________
    nie
    George F. May
    State Bar No. 24037050
    Da
    2 Riverway, 15th Floor
    is
    Houston, Texas 77056
    (713) 659-0000 Telephone
    hr
    (832) 201-8485 Facsimile
    C
    george@twomeymay.com
    of
    Attorneys for Plaintiff Jay Cohen
    e
    ffic
    yO
    op
    C
    ial
    fic
    of
    Un
    5
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.3 and 9.5(b), (d), (e), I certify that I have
    served this document on all other parties, which are listed below on July 29, 2015 as follows:
    Walter J. Cicack
    wcicack@hmgnc.com
    HAWASH MEAD GASTON NEESE & CICACK, LLP
    2118 Smith Street
    k
    Houston, Texas 77002
    ler
    Telephone: (713) 658-9001
    tC
    Facsimile: (713) 658-9011
    ric
    Attorneys for Defendant Tour Partners, Ltd.
    ist
    By (check all that apply)
    lD
    personal delivery
    nie
    mail
    commercial delivery service
    X                      Da
    fax, email, or electronic service
    is
    hr
    /s/ George F. May/
    C
    George F. May
    of
    Date: July 28, 2015
    e
    ffic
    yO
    op
    C
    ial
    fic
    of
    Un
    6
    EXHIBIT B
    FILE COPY
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    301 Fannin, Suite 245
    Houston, Texas 77002
    Thursday, August 13, 2015
    RE:    Case No. 14-15-00392-CV
    Style: Jay Cohen
    v. Tours Partners, Ltd. and Preston Realty Corporation
    Please be advised that on this day the Court       GRANTED   APPELLANT’S
    motion to supplement the record in the above cause.
    T. C. Case # 2013-41051                              Christopher Prine, Clerk
    Harris County, District Clerk, Civil Division
    Harris County District Clerk - Civil
    201 Caroline, Ste 420
    Houston, TX 77002
    DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    301 Fannin, Suite 245
    Houston, Texas 77002
    Thursday, August 13, 2015
    RE:    Case No. 14-15-00392-CV
    Style: Jay Cohen
    v. Tours Partners, Ltd. and Preston Realty Corporation
    Please be advised that on this day the Court       GRANTED   APPELLANT’S
    motion to supplement the record in the above cause.
    T. C. Case # 2013-41051                              Christopher Prine, Clerk
    Harris County, District Clerk, Civil Division
    Harris County District Clerk - Civil
    201 Caroline, Ste 420
    Houston, TX 77002
    DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL
    Exhibit 4
    CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page1of5
    Exhibit 5
    7A
    Pgs-5
    CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page2of5
    CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page3of5
    CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page4of5
    CertifiedDocumentNumber:63124687-Page5of5
    I, Chris Daniel, District Clerk of Harris
    County, Texas certify that this is a true and
    correct copy of the original record filed and or
    recorded in my office, electronically or hard
    copy, as it appears on this date.
    Witness my official hand and seal of office
    this March 30, 2015
    Certified Document Number:        63124687 Total Pages: 5
    Chris Daniel, DISTRICT CLERK
    HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
    In accordance with Texas Government Code 406.013 electronically transmitted authenticated
    documents are valid. If there is a question regarding the validity of this document and or seal
    please e-mail support@hcdistrictclerk.com
    Un
    of
    fic
    ial
    Co
    py
    O
    ffic
    e
    of
    C
    hr
    is
    Exhibit 6
    Da
    nie
    lD
    ist
    ric
    t   Cl
    er
    k
    Un
    of
    fic
    ial
    Co
    py
    O
    ffic
    e
    of
    C
    hr
    is
    Da
    nie
    lD
    ist
    ric
    t   Cl
    er
    k
    Un
    of
    fic
    ial
    Co
    py
    O
    ffic
    e
    of
    C
    hr
    is
    Da
    nie
    lD
    ist
    ric
    t   Cl
    er
    k
    Un
    offic
    ial
    C
    opy
    O
    ffic
    e
    of
    C
    hr
    is
    Da
    nie
    lD
    ist
    ric
    t   Cl
    er
    k
    Exhibit 7
    Sam Haren
    From:                                 Walter Cicack
    Sent:                                 Monday, November 16, 2015 7:28 PM
    To:                                   Sam Haren; George May
    Subject:                              RE: Status of Appeal
    George, would you at least give us the professional courtesy of a response? Thank you.
    Walter Cicack
    (713) 658‐9003 (direct)
    From: Sam Haren
    Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:02 AM
    To: Walter Cicack ; George May 
    Subject: RE: Status of Appeal
    George,
    After the expiration of last Friday’s deadline, Walter asked me to touch base with you regarding your appeal. Do you still
    intend to go forward with Cohen’s remaining case?
    Thanks,
    Sam
    From: Walter Cicack
    Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:24 AM
    To: George May 
    Cc: Sam Haren 
    Subject: Status of Appeal
    George, it appears that you decided not to file a brief in the appeal of Judge’s Hinde’s judgment despite the fact that you
    said you were going to do so and instructed me to inform the court of appeals that you were going to do so.  I will not
    even ask you what you intend to do in the other appeal since I cannot rely on your answer.  But I do have a simple
    question‐‐ do you oppose our motion asking for leave to allow us to file our brief after you file your brief? As you know,
    if Cohen does not pursue the appeal, our appeal point is moot and briefing would not be required. Please let me know
    your position on this by 3 pm tomorrow. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you for your
    consideration.
    Walter J. Cicack
    Partner
    2118 Smith Street | Houston, TX 77002
    tel (713) 658-9003 | mobile (713) 299-2127
    fax (713) 658-9011
    website | vCard | map | email
    This email may be a privileged communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it.
    1
    Exhibit 8
    2
    Sam Haren
    From:                                 Walter Cicack
    Sent:                                 Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:24 AM
    To:                                   George May
    Cc:                                   Sam Haren
    Subject:                              Status of Appeal
    George, it appears that you decided not to file a brief in the appeal of Judge’s Hinde’s judgment despite the fact that you
    said you were going to do so and instructed me to inform the court of appeals that you were going to do so.  I will not
    even ask you what you intend to do in the other appeal since I cannot rely on your answer.  But I do have a simple
    question‐‐ do you oppose our motion asking for leave to allow us to file our brief after you file your brief? As you know,
    if Cohen does not pursue the appeal, our appeal point is moot and briefing would not be required. Please let me know
    your position on this by 3 pm tomorrow. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you for your
    consideration.
    Walter J. Cicack
    Partner
    2118 Smith Street | Houston, TX 77002
    tel (713) 658-9003 | mobile (713) 299-2127
    fax (713) 658-9011
    website | vCard | map | email
    This email may be a privileged communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it.
    1
    ACCEPTED
    14-15-00392-CV
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    7/8/2015 4:55:58 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    Exhibit 9
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00705-CV

Filed Date: 12/8/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016