Bernard Morello v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                   ACCEPTED
    03-15-000428-cv
    7816354
    THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    11/13/2015 11:09:51 AM
    JEFFREY D. KYLE
    CLERK
    NO. 03-15-00428-CV
    ________________________________________________________________________
    FILED IN
    3rd COURT OF APPEALS
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS               AUSTIN, TEXAS
    FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS 11/13/2015 11:09:51 AM
    AT AUSTIN                  JEFFREY D. KYLE
    ________________________________________________________________________
    Clerk
    BERNARD MORELLO,
    Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee.
    _______________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from Cause No. D-1-GV-06-000627
    353RD Judicial District Court, Austin, Texas
    The Honorable Rhonda Hurley
    ________________________________________________________________________
    JURANEK LAW FIRM, PLLC, AND JAMES JURANEK’S PARTIALLY
    UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR BERNARD
    MORELLO AND TO SUBSITTUTE LAPEZE & JOHNS, PLLC AS LEAD
    COUNSEL
    ________________________________________________________________________
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    The Juranek Law Firm, PLLC and James Juranek (collectively “Movants”) file
    this partially unopposed motion to withdraw as lead counsel for Appellant Bernard
    Morello, and in support thereof would respectfully show the Court the following:
    1.     Basis for motion.        Movants file this Motion to withdraw from
    representation of this appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5.
    2.     Withdrawal with Substitution of Counsel.               This Motion is for
    withdrawal with substitution of counsel. Lapeze & Johns, PLLC, and Keith Lapeze,
    current co-counsel for Appellant, will continue acting as counsel for Appellant.
    3.     Good cause for withdrawal. The rules governing withdrawal require a
    showing of “good cause,” and courts have looked to the grounds identified in Texas
    Disciplinary Rule 1.15 for the bases for withdrawal. See In re A.R., 
    236 S.W.3d 460
    , 474
    (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.). Subsection (b) of Disciplinary Rule 1.15 lists specific
    instances under which an attorney may seek to withdraw.             Included among those
    instances are where “the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer
    regarding the lawyer’s services, including an obligation to pay the lawyer’s fee as agreed,
    and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the
    obligation is fulfilled.” TEX. DISCIPLINARY R. PROF’L CONDUCT, § 1.15(b)(5), reprinted
    in TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN, tit. 2, subtit. G, app. A (Vernon 1998).
    Movants undertook representation of Appellant on good faith and without
    requiring payment of a retainer; however, Movants’ fees and expenses have yet to be
    paid. Movants spoke with Appellant approximately 3 weeks prior to filing this motion
    and advised that unless payment was made, Movants would be forced to withdraw from
    the case. To date, Movants’ have not been paid their legal fees or expenses incurred to
    date on this appeal. Accordingly, Movants submit that good cause exists to permit their
    withdrawal as counsel in this matter. See In re Daniels, 
    138 S.W.3d 31
    , 35 (Tex. App.—
    San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding) (finding that counsel established good cause to
    withdraw where client failed to pay outstanding legal fees).
    4.     Client Notification.    Appellant has been notified via first class mail,
    certified mail, and hand delivery of the right to object to the relief sought in this motion.
    Such notice has been sent to the following last known address of Appellant: Bernard J.
    Morello, 5100 San Felipe, Unit 78E, Houston, TX 77056.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JURANEK LAW FIRM, PLLC
    ______________________
    By: JAMES JURANEK
    State Bar No. 24026888
    111 N. Ennis
    Houston, Texas 77003
    (713) 229-0699
    (888) 626-6596 (fax)
    james@jjfirm.com
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    The undersigned contact Appellant’s counsel (Craig Pritzlaff) about the contents
    of this motion and the relief requested. Mr. Pritzlaff advised that Appellee is unopposed
    to the relief sought.    Appellant has not indicated whether he opposes Movants’
    withdrawal in this matter.
    __________________________
    James Juranek
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was
    forwarded to Appellees’ Counsel via the electronic filing manager pursuant to Texas Rule
    of Appellate Procedure 9.2, on this 13th day of November, 2015.
    Lead Counsel for Appellees
    Craig J. Pritzlaff
    Assistant Attorney General
    P.O. Box 12548, MC-066
    Austin, TX 78711
    512.320.0911 (Fax)
    _____________________________
    James Juranek
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-15-00428-CV

Filed Date: 11/13/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016