Ex Parte: Darrick Marciano Kizzee ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                                    NO. 07-02-0148-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL A
    APRIL 10, 2002
    ______________________________
    EX PARTE DARRICK MARCIANO KIZZEE, RELATOR
    _______________________________
    Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
    By this original proceeding, relator Darrick Marciano Kizzee, proceeding pro se and
    in forma pauperis, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the petition
    for want of jurisdiction.
    This Court is obligated to determine, sua sponte, its jurisdiction in each case.
    Welch v. McDougal, 
    876 S.W.2d 218
    , 220 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1994, writ denied). That
    jurisdiction is established by various constitutional and statutory provisions. See, e.g.,
    Tex. Const. art. 5, § 6; Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.220 (Vernon 1988); Ex Parte Lewis, 
    663 S.W.2d 153
    , 154 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1983, no pet.).
    Article 11.05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Annotated (Vernon 1977)
    lists the courts which are authorized to issue a writ of habeas corpus. Absent from that list
    are the courts of appeals. Greenville v. State, 
    798 S.W.2d 361
    , 362 (Tex.App.--Beaumont
    1990, no pet.). This Court's habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate
    only. Denby v. State, 
    627 S.W.2d 435
    (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, original
    proceeding), cert. denied, 
    462 U.S. 1110
    , 
    103 S. Ct. 2461
    , 
    77 L. Ed. 2d 1338
    (1983).
    Moreover, relator's petition is directed to the 181st District Court of Potter County, Texas.
    Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for want of
    jurisdiction.
    Don H. Reavis
    Justice
    Do not publish.
    2