TIG Insurance Company v. Llebroc Industries, Inc. ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                      NO. 07-03-0115-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL A
    JULY 16, 2003
    ______________________________
    TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT
    V.
    LLEBROC INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLEE
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 72N D DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
    NO. 2002-517,025A; HONORABLE J. BLAIR CHERRY, JR., JUDGE
    _______________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION ON JOINT MOTION
    TO REVERSE JUDGM ENT AND REMAND CASE
    Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
    By this restricted appeal pursuant to the provisions of Rule 30 of the Texas Rules of
    Appellate Procedure, appellant TIG Insurance Company caused the record to be filed and
    timely filed its brief requesting that we reverse the default judgment that appellee Llebroc
    Industries, L.L.C. recover $110,160, plus interest and attorney’s fees from and of TIG. Llebroc
    has not filed a brief in response; instead, it joins TIG in a motion requesting that we reverse the
    default judgment and remand the case to the trial court for a new trial.
    By their joint motion, the parties stipulate (1) TIG is a foreign insurer with authority to
    transact business in Texas; (2) TIG did not participate in the hearing that resulted in the default
    judgment nor otherwise file a post-judgment motion or request for findings of fact and
    conclusions of law, but first appeared by filing its notice of appeal; (3) TIG timely filed its
    restricted appeal; and (4) the process server did not serve the registered agent or the
    Commissioner of Insurance. Citing Commodore Cty. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tkacik, 802 S.W .2d 913
    (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1991), clarified on reh’g, 
    809 S.W.2d 630
    (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1991, writ
    denied), the parties agree the default judgment signed November 22, 2002, should be reversed
    and the cause remanded based on the stipulated facts and Rule 30.
    This Court has the authority to render the relief requested pursuant to Rule 43.2(d) of
    the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See also Dunn v. Canadian Oil & Gas Services, Inc.,
    
    908 S.W.2d 323
    , 324 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1995, no writ). By their motion, the parties implicitly
    waive oral argument and agree the default judgment should be reversed and the proceeding
    remanded to the trial court. Accordingly, pursuant to the joint motion, the stipulations, and Rule
    43.2(d), we reverse the default judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further
    proceedings. See also Tex. R. App. P. 2. Having granted the relief requested by the parties,
    no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
    Per Curiam
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-03-00115-CV

Filed Date: 7/16/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015