Henry Pete v. State ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • PETE V. STATE

    NO. 07-03-0037-CR


    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


    AT AMARILLO


    PANEL D


    APRIL 17, 2003



    ______________________________




    HENRY PETE, APPELLANT


    V.


    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE




    _________________________________


    FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;


    NO. 85631; HONORABLE LARRY GIST, JUDGE


    _______________________________


    Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

    ABATEMENT AND REMAND

    Upon a plea of not guilty, appellant Henry Pete was convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at confinement for 10 years. The clerk's record and reporter's record have both been filed. Appellant's brief was due to be filed on March 24, 2003. On March 31, 2003, appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw in this Court asserting he discovered an irreconcilable conflict of interest because he was trial counsel for appellant's co-defendant. The docket sheet contained in the clerk's record reflects that appellant's trial counsel was retained. The notice of appeal was filed by appellant, pro se. Although no formal order appointing appellate counsel appears in the record, the docket sheet and the Notice of Filing Notice of Appeal reflect that Kevin S. Laine was appointed to represent appellant. The trial court has the responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent defendants, as well as the authority to relieve or replace counsel. See Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999, no pet.); see also Springer v. State, 940 S.W.2d 322, 323 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1997, no pet.). Further, the trial court retains authority to appoint or substitute counsel even after the appellate record has been filed. Enriquez, 999 S.W.2d at 908.

    Therefore, in the interest of judicial economy we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Upon remand the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter conduct a hearing to determine the following:

    1. whether to grant appellate counsel's motion to withdraw; and if so

    2. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal and is indigent and entitled to new appointed counsel.



    The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that appellant desires to continue the appeal, then the trial court shall also take such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant effective assistance of counsel, which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in the order appointing new counsel. Finally, the trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by Monday, June 2, 2003.

    It is so ordered.

    Per Curiam





    Do not publish.

    te the appeal;

    2. whether appellant is still indigent and entitled to appointed counsel;

    3. whether counsel for appellant has abandoned the appeal; and

    4. whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel given his attorney's failure to file a brief.

    If the trial court finds that the appellant is still indigent, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel. Accord Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (2) & (3). If the trial court appoints counsel for appellant, the judge shall state the name, address, and state bar number of said counsel in the court's findings. Moreover, the court shall further order appellant's counsel or appointed counsel to file appellant's brief no later than thirty (30) days after the date of the abatement hearing.

    Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given of, and shall conduct a hearing in accordance with provisions of Rule 38.8(b), supra, to determine the matters stated therein and enumerated above. After the hearing, the trial court shall cause the preparation of a supplemental clerk's record containing the court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may make and sign. Then the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's record and the reporter's record made at the hearing to be submitted to this Court not later than August 31, 1998.

    It is so ordered.

    Per Curiam



    Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 44.4.

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-03-00037-CR

Filed Date: 4/17/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015