Elizabeth Ann Hill v. State ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                            NO. 07-07-0065-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL E
    JUNE 19, 2007
    ______________________________
    ELIZABETH HILL,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 403rd DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY;
    NO. D-1-DC-05-300771; HON. BRENDA P. KENNEDY, PRESIDING
    _______________________________
    ABATEMENT AND REMAND
    __________________________________
    Before QUINN, C.J., HANCOCK, J., and BOYD, S.J.1
    Elizabeth Hill (appellant) appeals her murder conviction. Appellant’s brief was
    originally due April 20, 2007. On April 27, 2007, a letter was sent to counsel for appellant
    notifying him the brief was overdue and that the brief or response was due May 7, 2007.
    In response, counsel filed an extension motion, which was granted to June 8, 2007, with
    the admonition that no further extensions would be granted, and that if the brief was not
    1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignm ent. T E X . G O V ’T
    C OD E A N N . §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2006).
    filed by that date, the appeal would be abated. To date, no brief or extension motion has
    been filed in this Court.
    Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 403rd District
    Court of Travis County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court
    shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing
    to determine the following:
    1.     whether appellant is indigent;
    2.     whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and
    3.     whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of
    counsel due to appellate counsel’s failure to timely file an appellate
    brief. See Evitts v. Lucey, 
    469 U.S. 387
    , 394, 
    105 S. Ct. 830
    , 834-35,
    
    83 L. Ed. 2d 821
    , 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is
    entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of
    right and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and
    submitting an appellate brief).
    We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law
    addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to
    pursue the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, we
    further direct it to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal. The
    name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel,
    if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings
    of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be
    developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the
    aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s
    record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before July 19, 2007. Should additional
    2
    time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before July
    19, 2007.
    It is so ordered.
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-07-00065-CR

Filed Date: 6/19/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/8/2015