Shannon M. Hayes v. State ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                   NO. 07-04-0049-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL B
    FEBRUARY 23, 2004
    ______________________________
    SHANNON HAYES, APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
    NO. 2003-401754; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE
    _______________________________
    Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Shannon M. Hayes, appellant, pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary of a
    habitation and on March 5, 2003, the trial court sentenced him to five years confinement
    in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The court
    suspended his sentence and placed him on community supervision. He filed a pro se
    notice of appeal with this court on February 9, 2004.
    Our appellate jurisdiction over a criminal appeal is triggered through a timely notice
    of appeal. Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In the absence of
    a notice of appeal timely filed in compliance with the requirements of Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 26, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the
    appeal in a criminal case, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton
    v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). As applicable here, Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 26.2(a) requires a notice of appeal in a criminal case be filed within 30 days after
    the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within 90 days after imposition
    of the sentence if a timely motion for new trial is filed.
    Here, the court imposed and then suspended Hayes’ sentence on March 5, 2003.
    The record before us does not indicate whether he filed a motion for new trial. In any event,
    his notice of appeal, filed over ten months later, was untimely. Appellant’s failure to file a
    timely notice of appeal prevents this court from having jurisdiction over his appeal.
    Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    James T. Campbell
    Justice
    Do not publish.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-04-00049-CR

Filed Date: 2/23/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015