Randall Wayne Dixon v. State ( 2006 )


Menu:
  • BRIAN MILLSAP V. SHOW TRUCKS USA, INC.

    NO. 07-06-0307-CR

      

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

      

    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

      

    AT AMARILLO

      

    PANEL E

      

    DECEMBER 6, 2006

    ______________________________

      

    RANDALL DIXON,

      

    Appellant

      

    v.

      

    THE STATE OF TEXAS,

      

    Appellee

    _________________________________

      

    FROM THE 290 TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY;

      

    NO. 2004-CR-7578; HON. SHARON MACRAE, PRESIDING

    _______________________________

      

    ABATEMENT AND REMAND

    __________________________________

      

    Before QUINN, C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and BOYD, S.J. (footnote: 1)

    Randall Dixon (appellant) appeals his criminal convictions.  Per an extension of the deadline previously granted him, his appellate brief was due by November 15, 2006.  Yet, it has not been received to date.  This court informed appellant of this circumstance by letter dated November 22, 2006, and told him that unless a brief or response to our letter was received by the Court “on or before Monday, December 04, 2006, the appeal will be abated to the trial court.”  December 4 th passed without appellant filing either a brief or response to our November 22 nd letter.  

    Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 290 th District Court of Bexar County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

    1. whether appellant is indigent;

      

    1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and

      

    2.   whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due to appellate counsel’s failure to timely file an appellate brief.   See Evitts v. Lucey , 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35, 83 L. Ed. 2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and submitting an appellate brief).

      

    We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing subjects.  Should the trial court find that appellant desires to pursue the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, we further direct it to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal.  The name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel, if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.  Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the aforementioned hearing.  Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before January 5, 2007.  Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before January 5, 2007.

    It is so ordered.

    Per Curiam

    Do not publish.

    FOOTNOTES

    1:

    John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.   Tex. Gov’t Code Ann . §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2006).

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-06-00307-CR

Filed Date: 12/6/2006

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015