Douglas D. Cox v. State ( 2006 )

NO. 07-05-0387-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
APRIL 25, 2006
______________________________
DOUGLAS D. COX,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE 140th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2005-409,333; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING
_______________________________
ABATEMENT AND REMAND
__________________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Douglas D. Cox (appellant) appeals his conviction for theft from a person 65 or over.
After granting appellant a prior extension, his brief was due no later than April 17, 2006 (a
date requested by appellant’s counsel). No brief has been received by this court. Nor has
appellant explained the delay.
Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 140th District
Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court
shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing
to determine the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and,
2. whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of
counsel due to appellate counsel’s failure to timely file appellate brief.
See Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35, 83
L. Ed. 2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is entitled
to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right
and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and
submitting an appellate brief).
We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law
addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to
pursue the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, we
further direct it to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal. The
name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel,
if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings
of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be
developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions
of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the
aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s
record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before May 25, 2006. Should additional
time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before May
25, 2006.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
2