Ray Joiner, Jr. v. State ( 2014 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00081-CR
Ray Joiner, Jr., Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 14,794, THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Ray Joiner, Jr., was convicted by a jury of unlawful possession of a firearm
by a felon and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 46.04(a)(1),
22.02(a)(2). The jury assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice for eight years and eighteen years, respectively. In addition, the jury assessed a
$5,000 fine for the aggravated assault charge. See id. §§ 12.33, 12.34. The trial court sentenced
appellant in accordance with the jury’s verdict and ordered the sentences to be served concurrently.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a
brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there
are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988).
Appellant’s counsel has represented to this Court that he sent copies of the motion
and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro
se response, and provided a form motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See Kelly
v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744.
Appellant timely requested access to the appellate record, and pursuant to this Court’s order, the
clerk of the trial court provided written verification to this Court that the record was provided to
appellant. See Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 321. Appellant then requested an extension of time to file his
pro se response, which this Court granted. To date, appellant has not filed a pro se response or
requested any additional extension of time to file a response.
We have conducted an independent review of the record and find no reversible error.
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27
(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious
grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The
judgments of conviction are affirmed.
2
__________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Affirmed
Filed: December 3, 2014
Do Not Publish
3