Richardo Cantu Resendez v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                      In The
    Court of Appeals
    Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
    No. 07-14-00378-CR
    RICARDO CANTU RESENDEZ, APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    On Appeal from the 320th District Court
    Potter County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 68807-D, Honorable Don R. Emerson, Presiding
    December 4, 2014
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
    Appearing pro se, appellant Ricardo Cantu Resendez attempts to appeal his
    conviction and sentence of six years’ confinement in prison for fraudulent use or
    possession of identifying information.1 Sentence was imposed on July 28, 2014, and
    appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 17, 2014. Appellant did not file a motion
    for new trial.
    1
    TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 32.51(c)(2) (West Supp. 2014).
    By letter, we notified appellant his notice of appeal appeared untimely thus
    depriving us of appellate jurisdiction. We afforded him an opportunity to file documents
    or matters he considered necessary for determination of our jurisdiction. Appellant
    made no response.
    Our appellate jurisdiction is triggered through a timely notice of appeal. Olivo v.
    State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellate rule 26.2(a) requires a
    notice of appeal in a criminal case be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is
    imposed in open court or within 90 days after imposition of the sentence if a timely
    motion for new trial is filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), (2).
    Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due
    within thirty days after the date sentence was imposed in open court. Appellant’s notice
    of appeal was filed more than eighty days after imposition of sentence and was
    therefore untimely. Our appellate jurisdiction has not been invoked.
    Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.2
    James T. Campbell
    Justice
    Do not publish.
    2
    We do not reach the second issue called to appellant’s attention by our letter.
    The trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal states this “is a plea-bargain
    case and the defendant has no right of appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2),(d).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-14-00378-CR

Filed Date: 12/9/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/9/2014