Ex Parte Kimly Rusha Terrell ( 2014 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00346-CR
EX PARTE KIMLY RUSHA TERRELL
From the 54th District Court
McLennan County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2010-627-C2
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 7, 2014, we received a document from Kimly Rusha Terrell related
to an earlier appeal styled Terrell v. State which was docketed as 10-11-00022-CR. The
conviction in 10-11-00022-CR is final. Our mandate issued January 13, 2012.
It is difficult to tell what request Terrell has made and who has acted or failed to
act on her request. Based on the nature of the relief requested from this Court, we have
determined Terrell’s request to be a request for post-conviction relief; that is, a petition
for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07. 1 See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07
1In the event this document is meant to be a petition for writ of mandamus to order the trial court or trial
court clerk to provide Terrell a free copy of her criminal trial record, Terrell is not entitled to a free copy
unless she can show that a post-conviction proceeding is not frivolous and that she has a specific need for
(West 2005). We have no jurisdiction to grant post-conviction relief in an attack on a
final felony judgment. See id. art 11.05. Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for
lack of jurisdiction.
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Petition dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed December 4, 2014
Do not publish
OT06
the record. Escobar v. State, 880 S.W.2d 782, 784 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, order); see also In re
Rodriguez, No. 10-13-00201-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 8662 (Tex. App.—July 11, 2013, no pet.) (not
designated for publication). The need for a record from a prior proceeding simply to search for possible
post-conviction issues is not enough. Id. Based on what Terrell filed here, she has not shown she is
entitled to relief by mandamus. Therefore, we would deny her petition if her request was denied by the
trial court and dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction if her request was denied by the trial court clerk.
Ex parte Terrell Page 2