Jesica Alys Mascorro v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               NUMBER 13-15-00286-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    JESICA ALYS MASCORRO,                                                        Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                           Appellee.
    On appeal from the 36th District Court
    of Aransas County, Texas.
    ORDER
    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes
    Per Curiam
    Appellant, Jesica Alys Mascorro, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from
    her conviction in trial court cause number A-14-5169-2-CR. The trial court’s certification
    of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to
    appeal.   See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure
    provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has
    a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R.
    APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4.
    Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel,
    Hon. Coretta Graham, is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine
    whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s
    findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the
    existence of any amended certification.
    If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is
    further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of receipt of this
    notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to
    appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, No. 04-03-
    00473-CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7317 (San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (designated for
    publication) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified
    to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the
    form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual
    allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. Cf. Woods v. State, 
    108 S.W.3d 314
    , 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3)
    and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the
    record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the
    certification affecting appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1, 10.2.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed the 1st day of July 2015.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-15-00286-CR

Filed Date: 7/2/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/2/2015